New Zealand

There is no intellectual bankruptcy in asserting that there is such a thing as a "woman."
You are resorting to strawman argument. No-one is denying that there are women.
But we are also open to the possibility that your narrow definition (which you have failed to define other than it's a female adult) does not apply.
There 50 shades of grey to be considered.
 
I assert that sex is real, not imaginary, and that there is such a thing as a "woman."

It seems you cannot accept these facts.
Two more strawmen arguments.
JohnD, if you feel the need tor resort to strawmen arguments, it illustrates the fragility of your argument.
 
Since sex is real, not imaginary, a person cannot change it simply by uttering the magic words "I am a woman."

A person with cock and balls, male hormones and male chromosomes is not a woman, and will not turn into one no matter how much he wishes it.
If they wish to be recognised and treated as a woman, i.e they adopt the female gender, and it doesn't matter to anyone else, why should their wish not be respected, just because you believe that sex can only be binary, which is disproved by science, and non-binary sex is accepted in legal terms.
 
And, therefore, is not entitled to enter a single-sex segregated women's space such as a changing room, naked spa, communal shower, or prison.
I notice you have avoided addressing the issue of transmen being accommodated in female prisons, or competing in women's sports.
 
And, therefore, is not entitled to enter a single-sex segregated women's space such as a changing room, naked spa, communal shower, or prison.
Do you know of any examples where such trans people want to display their genitals in such places.
In prisons, generally ( :rolleyes: ) trans people do not have the opportunity to voluntarily enter a woman's prison.
 
Didn't somebody say that already, like, 20 times?
And we are dealing with someone who insists on imposing his view on others, despite medical science proving him wrong.
He's entitled to his opinion, if it is his opinion, but when you pointedly refuse to accept someone for what they want to be, it's tantamount to ignoring their wishes and disrespecting them.
If I wish to be French, Vegan, Muslim or whatever, no amount of denial and refusal from A N Other that my wish should be respected will prevent me from being French, Vegan, Muslim, or whatever.
 
but when you pointedly refuse to accept someone for what they want to be

yeah, but the same conversation is just repeated. No views changed, no new ideas, just the same being repeated day after day.

Next topic please!
 
Like a man who thinks that if he says "I am a woman" he will turn into one.
She already considers herself to be a woman. It's just that she might not have all the biological anatomy normally associated with the female sex, because sex is not binary, and nor is gender, as proven and defined by medical science, for the umpteenth time.
 
dysphoria

"Gender dysphoria is a term that describes a sense of unease that a person may have because of a mismatch between their biological sex and their gender identity."

A feeling of discomfort or unease does not turn a man into a woman.
 
yeah, but the same conversation is just repeated. No views changed, no new ideas, just the same being repeated day after day.

Next topic please!
I agree entirely.
But just like when someone repeatedly argues that different races must exist within the human race, otherwise racism cannot exist, then people need to accept the blindingly obvious medical science, even if their faith or value ideology causes them problems.
 
Now that we've exhausted your strawmen arguments, will you address the situation of trans men being accommodated in women's prisons, and competing in women's sports?
 
Back
Top