C
Captain Nemesis
There are parents in the world who deny their children all medical treatment.
Carry on Lab Rats...
- Thread starter ellal
- Start date
Sponsored Links
C
Captain Nemesis
Fine.
But he must not be allowed to spread his lies. And if the evidence shows that he poses a significant risk to others because he wont be vaccinated he must be quarantined.
C
Captain Nemesis
Of course it matters.
No, you are arguing with those who know what they are saying when you dont.
Talk about shooting yourself in the foot. Claiming that when you are doing precisely the opposite of using the meanings of words.
The problem is that because you dont know what the words you are using actually mean you have decided that they mean things which simply do not exist, and therefore you are suggesting that people should worry about impossibilities.
C
Captain Nemesis
Well - Im afraid that really does serve her right.
Which is why Ellal and the others should be shut down if they wont shut up, and why I would welcome regulations which would shut websites down if they wont shut people like that down. "Freedom of speech" should not mean the right to lie to people and thereby kill them.
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 14,271
- Reaction score
- 2,079
- Country
The concept of viral vector-based vaccines, such as the AZ one, was introduced almost 50 years ago and has been used successfully for years with no long term problems. What makes you think the AZ one will be the odd one out?
C
Captain Nemesis
And in saying that you show that you are so determined to be blindly ignorant that you wilfully ignore the difference between chronic ingestion of materials with unknown properties and a very limited exposure to medicines of a type which do not have unknown long-term risks.
C
Captain Nemesis
Whatever it is, "thought" is not part of it.
No, asbestosis is a delayed onset effect. Lung scarring from either is cumulative, immediate and long term.
Pretty much. There's never been a vaccine effect that took longer than that to appear. It's possible that we haven't found some that have already presented, but they've got to be tiny to have missed detection so far. For example the clotting issue only occurs 12 times per million people, and fatally something around 1 or 2 per million. It's very hard to spot that sort of signal. We might have missed some less common adverse effects, but they have to be very very very uncommon.
If you're too sloppy with language you can't communicate effectively and make mistakes. As you have demonstrated.
Last edited:
Well this is good news:
"Long COVID risk halves after double vaccination
Your data contributed to exciting research published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, revealing that having two doses of a COVID vaccine halves your risk of contracting Long COVID if you do get infected. This is promising news, especially amid the high prevalence of the virus at the moment. Read more about the research on our blog."
"Long COVID risk halves after double vaccination
Your data contributed to exciting research published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, revealing that having two doses of a COVID vaccine halves your risk of contracting Long COVID if you do get infected. This is promising news, especially amid the high prevalence of the virus at the moment. Read more about the research on our blog."
Death rate going down now that plenty have been jabbed. Things starting to get back to normal. Pubs and entertainment venues opening up, people socialising and going back to work. They’re long term benefits aren’t they?
As I said, can YOU provide evidence of there being no long term side effects?
(not government imposed 'benefits')
No you can't...
So don't side step the issue!
How about those 'Doctor' sons you say you have. Have they got any evidence either way?
They have 'evidence', but I don't divulge their information to internet stalkers...
As I said before, can YOU provide evidence of there being no long term side effects?
Yes or no?
Sponsored Links
