So when will the Met investigate the party?

How should all the spoiled votes be counted?


Good candidates would help.

As I've said before, I always lived in a 'safe' constituency on both sides of the fence, so my vote has NEVER made any difference.

If its spoiled its not counted, unless you want a tally of spoiled votes.
 
Because you are suggesting only 28% rejected it? While that is true, it doesn’t mean 72% were in favour.

Either the exam question was wrong or the majority (almost 70%) rejected it. So it doesn’t support the idea that people want change.
Perhaps if you put your two comments together:
If the question was the wrong question, why would anyone bother voting, or if you like: none of the above.
If the question had been about PR, and not AV, then the turn out might have been greater.

As we've already established, the persistent winners, left and right wing don't want change, all 28% of the electorate, don't want change.
For sure it doesn't mean that the other 72% do want change. But it can also mean other things: it's waste of time voting, nothing will ever change anyway, it's the wrong question, etc. In other words: none of the above.
 
People need to be encouraged to vote.
I fully agree, but compulsion is not an acceptable way. Education is the right way.
Making it easier is another way.
Removing the potential for using the electoral roll to investigate crime may be another way, but I'm not sure I would be comfortable with that.
But the electoral roll is used for multiple other uses besides voting, and that discourages people from being on that roll.
 
quite a few countries make voting compulsory .
Compulsory attendance only makes you attend.
Once there, you may as well vote. or spoil the ballot.
Or apply for a postal vote.

maybe enter each attendee at a polling station in a draw to win a lottery style prize?
 
quite a few countries make voting compulsory .
Compulsory attendance only makes you attend.
Once there, you may as well vote. or spoil the ballot.
Or apply for a postal vote.

maybe enter each attendee at a polling station in a draw to win a lottery style prize?
Good idea, Hey hang on that's ageist, 'cos older people are more likely to use postal votes. :whistle:
 
quite a few countries make voting compulsory .
Compulsory attendance only makes you attend.
Once there, you may as well vote. or spoil the ballot.
Or apply for a postal vote.

maybe enter each attendee at a polling station in a draw to win a lottery style prize?
Making people attend to spoil things?
 
What do you tell people , the truth? :LOL:
Thought you wanted more voters?
I don't mean education in terms of any one party's policies. I mean education about how the system works, how the different levels of government interact, how to improve or increase an individual's influence, how politics can be and is manipulated etc.
 
Back
Top