A number of asylum

[transam]

Seekers ( 18?) are on hunger strike as they are going to be deported to Rwanda they said they would rather die than go to Rwanda ?

 

[Deleted member 292770]

oh well

 

[Stivino]

F,kem! Stick them on the plane, by the time they get to Rwanda they’ll eat anything.

 

[transam]

Tis lucky they are not. Being deported to South Africa
Just been a report on the news of the increase of serious violence against migrants there

 

[ReganAndCarter]

Hopefully they will get in their rubber dinghies and feck off back to France.

 

[Deleted member 294929]

I wouldn't eat the food in Rwanda either.

 

[fillyboy]

Hopefully they will get in their rubber dinghies and feck off back to France.

I'm confused, you continually criticise the only political party who even attempt to limit immigration yet your biggest gripe is that you can't Emigrate or retire to Warsaw or Prague to enjoy cheap lager because of brexit.

 

[Deleted member 294929]

I'm confused, you continually criticise the only political party who even attempt to limit immigration yet your biggest gripe is that you can't Emigrate or retire to Warsaw or Prague to enjoy cheap lager because of brexit.

And dislikes foreigners

 

[Deleted member 294929]

Seekers ( 18?) are on hunger strike as they are going to be deported to Rwanda they said they would rather die than go to Rwanda ?

This is a deterant. So far seems to be working... the way I understand is that once in Rwanda they are free to leave. Then they can start all over again.

 

[IT Minion]

This is a deterant. So far seems to be working... the way I understand is that once in Rwanda they are free to leave. Then they can start all over again.

It doesn't seem to be working.

The claim was that it'll slash the number of people seeking asylum here. I don't believe the number of people crossing the channel has decreased at all yet.

But it is early days, after all we haven't seen anyone actually shipped off yet and none of the suicide attempts have been successful. Although I suppose some posters here would accept that as a win if they were @andy11

 

[Deleted member 294929]

But it is early days, after all we haven't seen anyone actually shipped off yet and none of the suicide attempts have been successful. Although I suppose some posters here would accept that as a win if they

It's not even early days. Nothing has happened. Someone may commit suicide. It may however save life's of people crossing oceans and Seas .

 

[IT Minion]

It's not even early days. Nothing has happened.

Then how can you say it's working?

Good practice for any sort of change is to identify what a successful result would be and what a failure would be. Success has been defined as fewer asylum seekers crossing the channel, so far it hasn't succeed.

 

[Mottie]

This is a deterant. So far seems to be working... the way I understand is that once in Rwanda they are free to leave. Then they can start all over again.

It’s like a game of snakes and ladders. Hopefully they’ll learn that landing in the UK is like landing on a snake.

 

[Odds]

It’s like a game of snakes and ladders. Hopefully they’ll learn that landing in the UK is like landing on a snake.

But how will they learn this?
I don't think papers like the Mail and Express are available in Africa and the BBC has a limited reach. And even then, what would you do when faced with famine, drought, war and all the problems faced by these people.
A person faced with a small chance of success and desperate enough to take the risk will do so, regardless of sanction or threat.

 

[Deleted member 294929]

Then how can you say it's working?

Good practice for any sort of change is to identify what a successful result would be and what a failure would be. Success has been defined as fewer asylum seekers crossing the channel, so far it hasn't succeed.

How do we know stocking Nuclear weapons are a deterant?