So what?The manual states 25A Fuse Protection
Can you do sums? 4800/240 = 20A (that's actually 19.2A at 230V which you are supposed to use for design).
Does that mean you would not buy it because you have MCBs?
So what?The manual states 25A Fuse Protection
Was responding to your earlier comment re. actual manufacturers specifications.So what?
As is so often said, if the manufacturer feels that the equipment requires a particular degree of overcurrent protection, then such protection 'should' (one could easily say 'must') be provided within the equipment.That is true for items which are portable, and plug in, the MCB/Fuse/RCBO is to protect the cable. But for equipment which is installed, the manufacturer can, and often does stipulate the protective device to be used,
That's surely a situation in which the equipment 'must' have the internal protection deemed necessary by the manufacturer - since I would have thought that it would be extremely unlikely that the supply to the equipment would be protected ('eternal' to the equipment) by a "semiconductor fuse", isn't it?I have had machines with solid state relays stipulate must be protected with a semi-conductor fuse, a MCB is no good.
I am personally comfortable working on the basis of that assumption.Ovens cannot draw more than their design current.
When designing something the designer has to "scrape the barrel" in order to find all the possible failure modes that could affect the item, system or installation being designed.the problem is that Sunray and bernard, to name but two, will scrape barrels
Wouldn’t the “safest” option be to use a 25a breaker in my situation? That covers all bases?When designing something the designer has to "scrape the barrel" in order to find all the possible failure modes that could affect the item, system or installation being designed.
Only when all possible modes are known can each mode be given a calculated / estimated factor of probability
An appliance using resistive heating elements can have a failure mode that causes the current flowing on the Live wire to be higher than the designed current. If an RCD is in the supply then this will trip and cut the supply, Without an RCD the current will continue to flow until a fuse or an MCB operates. ( or the overheating section of element melts.
All that technical data applies to the oven. One can assume it means 25a built in fuse protection.The manual states 25A Fuse Protection
How many times do you have to be told the breaker is to protect the cable not the oven?Wouldn’t the “safest” option be to use a 25a breaker in my situation? That covers all bases?
Whilst I could use a 63a breaker in my situation (as I have a 10mm cable), I am unclear as to the benefits of this. Other than future proofing, if I fit a higher rated oven and want to avoid nuisance tripping.
Can you help me out with the above consideration please.
With respect, there is a divergent of views on this.How many times do you have to be told the breaker is to protect the cable not the oven?
Anyway 25a breakers are difficult to source.
Yes but the manufacturer states you must use a 25A fuse.With respect, there is a divergent of views on this.
A 32a breaker would also be protecting the cable?
No there isn’t.With respect, there is a divergent of views on this.
Indeed, but so what?A 32a breaker would also be protecting the cable?
I suggested 32a instead of a 25a MCB as @winston1 indicated that the latter is hard to sourceYes but the manufacturer states you must use a 25A fuse.
If you think the manufacturer's "instructions" so important, you cannot say you must have a 25A overload device because the manufacturer says so and then ignore the type the manufacturer states.
You can't have it both ways.
Either you follow the manufacturer's "instructions" or you work it all out for yourself.
Back to my question. What size MCB should I use in this situation?Indeed, but so what?
They do indeed. Then, as you go on to say ....,When designing something the designer has to "scrape the barrel" in order to find all the possible failure modes that could affect the item, system or installation being designed.
Quite so, but it is the next stage in the process which is relevant here. On the basis of that estimated probability, one has to decide whether 'addressing' the potential risk is necessary, or even necessarily 'justified'. Implicit in that decision is an acceptance that leaving non-zero (but extremely small) risks unaddressed is sometimes the sensible and rational course - particularly given that the 'addressing' will nearly always be associated with some sort of 'costs', sometimes even definite 'downside'.Only when all possible modes are known can each mode be given a calculated / estimated factor of probability
As often discussed, it can. It therefore comes down to the risk assessment' mentioned above - and it is my personal opinion (which you don't appear to share) that the probability of such an event is so low as to not require (or really justify) addressing it in any way.An appliance using resistive heating elements can have a failure mode that causes the current flowing on the Live wire to be higher than the designed current.
For the umpteenth time the one you have is OK. No need to spend money, time, or effortBack to my question. What size MCB should I use in this situation?
Sorry, I’m still unclear on this.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local