Lots wearing masks this week again.

[gant]

You can look up what is in the vaccine, do you need a link?

See it got you running to Google, even though you were told it was safe.
Not so much a doubting Thomas more a doubting Denso eh.

 

[denso13]

As I say, I'm interested in your thoughts in a non-argumentative way.

It ranges. Sometimes a deliberate attempt to reduce the world's population by injecting people with a deadly vaccine. Sometimes it is only to line the pockets of "big pharma" (I could come up with far easier ways).

You won't get a coherent argument from the anti vaxxer community unfortunately.

 

[ellal]

Gas has fallen into a hole of fantasy.

So you are posting here and yet won't answer the question posed to you...

I'll remind you to give you another chance...

"Define exactly an 'anti vaxxer'...

Is it someone who refuses all vaccine jabs for all illnesses/diseases?

Or is it someone who doesn't wish at a particular point in time not to have a particular jab or jabs?"

Why won't you answer?

 

[denso13]

even though you were told it was safe.

It is demonstrably safe. No doubt about it.

 

[denso13]

Why won't you answer?

Priceless...

 

[ellal]

What lies?

Just a small example...

Linky Linky

Unless of course you disagree with the BMJ?

 

[ellal]

Priceless...

As always clueless...

I wonder if you'll answer the proof of 'lies'?

 

[JohnD]

Why won't you answer?

Because you are asking a silly and pointless question, attempting to divert the discussion away from the lunatic fantasies of antivaxxers such as yourself.

 

[denso13]

Just a small example...

Linky Linky

Unless of course you disagree with the BMJ?

Where are the lies in your link?

 

[denso13]

Unless of course you disagree with the BMJ?

Do you agree with the BMJ views on covid and the vaccine?

 

[denso13]

I wonder if you'll answer the proof of 'lies'?

You still haven't shown any.

 

[ellal]

Because you are asking a silly and pointless question, attempting to divert the discussion away from the lunatic fantasies of antivaxxers such as yourself.

No, I'm simply asking you for your definition of 'anti vaxxer'...

Because this term is being spread around and aimed at those who wish not to be jabbed against a particular 'virus', but many of those people may get jabs for other illnesses/diseases...

The person diverting the discussion is yourself, because you won't define your accusation!

Maybe because you don't have a clue about the definition of 'anti vaxxer'?

 

[ellal]

You still haven't shown any.

Well it seems that an old saying is true...

You can lead a horse (especially a denso one) to water etc etc

 

[JohnD]

No, I'm simply asking you for your definition of 'anti vaxxer'...

No, you're an antivaxxer. Your made-up claims about vaccines are nonsense.

 

[ellal]

No, you're an antivaxxer. Your made-up claims about vaccines are nonsense.

Still no proper answer then...

Are you talking about all vaccines or just these particular 'virus' ones?

And the only points that I have made are that I don't believe that they have been properly tested and I have fears for the human immune system.

Can you explain why as I've had jabs for other illnesses/diseases and have had our children vaccinated over the years, you can still call me an 'anti vaxxer'?

One of my parents is now in care and I have given permission for her to have a 'virus booster' despite not wishing to have a jab myself, but because I know that is what she wants...

So does that make me an 'anti vaxxer'?

But since you appear to believe that everyone should be vaccinated against this 'virus', then should you be allowed to be described as a 'rabid jabber'?