Right to Reply

[Deleted member 18243]

I am no longer able to reply to the current threads about immigration. They say that if you want to know the truth about anything find out what you are not allowed to say.

It is all very sad as I still had outstanding matters to discuss. Not least Notch's statement that he wants Britain to take one million immigrants per year.

Not just one million, but one million per year.

I questioned Notch about this outrageous statement, but he didn't reply. (He can reply but won't; I can't reply but would if I could!) I just wanted to ask what is his plan for all these extra people?

1) How did he arrive at the figure of one million per year?
2) For how many years would he want them to come at that rate?
3) Does he have a plan prepared in advance of them coming, complete with housing and food for them etc., so that there is not chaos?
4) What would they all do - what is all this work he says is available for them?
5) If year two's million are of a different race than year one's, how does he plan to handle racial disharmony, and will he call year one's immigrants "right-wing extremists" for being hostile to year two's million?
6) Is he not concerned about overcrowding? There will be exponential growth.

 

[fillyboy]

I am no longer able to reply to the current threads about immigration. They say that if you want to know the truth about anything find out what you are not allowed to say.

It is all very sad as I still had outstanding matters to discuss. Not least Notch's statement that he wants Britain to take one million immigrants per year.

Not just one million, but one million per year.

I questioned Notch about this outrageous statement, but he didn't reply. (He can reply but won't; I can't reply but would if I could!) I just wanted to ask what is his plan for all these extra people?

1) How did he arrive at the figure of one million per year?
2) For how many years would he want them to come at that rate?
3) Does he have a plan prepared in advance of them coming, complete with housing and food for them etc., so that there is not chaos?
4) What would they all do - what is all this work he says is available for them?
5) If year two's million are of a different race than year one's, how does he plan to handle racial disharmony, and will he call year one's immigrants "right-wing extremists" for being hostile to year two's million?
6) Is he not concerned about overcrowding? There will be exponential growth.

They'll need to build a large estate on the outskirts of his village, he'll be delighted.

 

[Dork Lard]

I don't know how it happened & it may be a mistake, but somehow one of our resident Marxist's has been given the ability to censor any opinion it doesn't agree with.

Diynot is now a socialist utopia & you are a thorn in its side.

 

[fillyboy]

I don't know how it happened & it may be a mistake, but somehow one of our resident Marxist's has been given the ability to censor any opinion it doesn't agree with.

Diynot is now a socialist utopia & you are a thorn in its side.

Good old JohnD.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Or probably, violent extremism is not wanted.

 

[Notch7]

They'll need to build a large estate on the outskirts of his village, he'll be delighted.

The outskirts of my village is Crawley, the ship has sailed on that.

 

[Deleted member 174758]

Diynot is now a socialist utopia & you are a thorn in its side.

The outskirts of my village is Crawley, the ship has sailed on that.

Creepy Crawley, eh? (Sorry, couldn't resist it - the result of having done some work.on Gatport Airwick, and it was really what the guys there called it - especially when we said we were lodging there)

You guys just crack me up sometimes!

 

[Notch7]

Creepy Crawley, eh? (Sorry, couldn't resist it - the result of having done some work.on Gatport Airwick, and it was really what the guys there called it - especially when we said we were lodging there)

Yup, that’s the one.

My company supplied the joinery for the Weatherspoons airside at Gatwick South terminal.

 

[Pat ex]

I am no longer able to reply to the current threads about immigration. They say that if you want to know the truth about anything find out what you are not allowed to say.
...

If your comments can be interpreted as extremist promotion of violence, you can't seriously be surprised that your comments cannot be tolerated.
The owners, the mods and Admin have a duty to not allow the site to be used for the promotion of such extremism.
You may not like the law, but it is the law.

No doubt if there were comments extolling other extreme violent action, you would be astounded.
But right wing extremism is equally as dangerous as any other form of extremism.

 

[Dork Lard]

If your comments can be interpreted as extremist promotion of violence, you can't seriously be surprised that your comments cannot be tolerated.
The owners, the mods and Admin have a duty to not allow the site to be used for the promotion of such extremism.
You may not like the law, but it is the law.

No doubt if there were comments extolling other extreme violent action, you would be astounded.
But right wing extremism is equally as dangerous as any other form of extremism.

Please allow me to point out what makes this post nonsense.

If anyone is here to promote extremism & extremism is a problem to you, then you BAN the extremist.

You don't get to 'CENSOR' the extremist, once you travel that path then you expose yourself as a censor of anything other than your viewpoint.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Please allow me to point out what makes this post nonsense.

If anyone is here to promote extremism & extremism is a problem to you, then you BAN the extremist.

You don't get to 'CENSOR' the extremist, once you travel that path then you expose yourself as a censor of anything other than your viewpoint.

or you give somebody a chance to be sensible before banning them.

do you agree with violent extremism? Do you think it's ok on a public forum?

 

[Pat ex]

Please allow me to point out what makes this post nonsense.

If anyone is here to promote extremism & extremism is a problem to you, then you BAN the extremist.

You don't get to 'CENSOR' the extremist, once you travel that path then you expose yourself as a censor of anything other than your viewpoint.

I haven't censored the poster. The mods did that, without my interference.
I will object to and expose such violent extremist remarks when and if I detect them.

I don't have the power to ban anyone.

Now based on those comments, please point out the "nonsense" of my comments.

 

[Dork Lard]

or you give somebody a chance to be sensible before banning them.

do you agree with violent extremism? Do you think it's ok on a public forum?

People have died to give other people the right to think & express themselve's freely.

On the basis that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, then subjective / objective arguments should be allowed in any & all forums.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

People have died to give other people the right to think & express themselve's freely.

On the basis that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, then subjective / objective arguments should be allowed in any & all forums.

Express themselves freely, not violently

Besides he doesn't have any subjective information or argument. Just violent rants

 

[Pat ex]

People have died to give other people the right to think & express themselve's freely.

On the basis that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter, then subjective / objective arguments should be allowed in any & all forums.

The fomenting of violent extremism is not allowed by law.
If it was any other kind of promotion of violent extremism, I suspect the forum would be in uproar.