Why has nobody given me £65million?
- Thread starter JohnD
- Start date
Because you’re a serial complainer and Tory hater? Maybe to get the 65 mil you just have to keep your trap shut.
Or pay my gas bill.
In unrelated news
"PPE Medpro has for months been embroiled in a scandal after reports that lingerie entrepreneur Baroness Michelle Mone lobbied ministers using their personal email addresses to help ensure the company received lucrative government contracts totalling more than £200mn. She has consistently denied having any relationship with the company."
"Late last year, bank documents reported by The Guardian and the FT outlined how at least £65mn in profits from the company were sent to accounts that benefited Mone or her husband, Douglas Barrowman, who had also previously denied involvement with PPE Medpro."
"PPE Medpro has for months been embroiled in a scandal after reports that lingerie entrepreneur Baroness Michelle Mone lobbied ministers using their personal email addresses to help ensure the company received lucrative government contracts totalling more than £200mn. She has consistently denied having any relationship with the company."
"Late last year, bank documents reported by The Guardian and the FT outlined how at least £65mn in profits from the company were sent to accounts that benefited Mone or her husband, Douglas Barrowman, who had also previously denied involvement with PPE Medpro."
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,071
- Reaction score
- 5,495
- Country
Did you forget the bit where the government is suing the supplier for the full £122 million and a further £11.6 million for storing and disposing of the gowns, plus interest?
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,071
- Reaction score
- 5,495
- Country
But these allegations are denied by her. if she received payments for favour as a "fixer", which may well come out in the legal proceedings, then she is likely to go to prison along with anyone involved the fixer payment.
Perhaps you should start another thread then for those on here that are interested in off-topic unrelated news items?
- Joined
- 22 Dec 2021
- Messages
- 2,416
- Reaction score
- 340
- Country
I'd be VERY surprised if there was any £money left in the company. Suing is OK if there's a prospect of actually getting the money back . . . .
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,071
- Reaction score
- 5,495
- Country
One would hope the legal team have done their due diligence. First they must win the claim. Its quite possible that the product met the contract while still not being suitable. The NHS are not consumers they do not have "fit for purpose" statutory rights, they must spell out their needs clearly.
I'm not saying they didn't and their claim is weak.. I'm saying they must first win.
I'm not saying they didn't and their claim is weak.. I'm saying they must first win.
Surely the idea is that she has no relationship with this company? In which case the £65million must have been an unsolicited gift? A bit like when a Nigerian prince emails you?
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,071
- Reaction score
- 5,495
- Country
read subsection 4 & 5: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/23/section/1
It doesn't matter if the payment was made to someone in order to get someone else to do something special which would be improper. The two someone's need not be the same.
It doesn't matter if the payment was made to someone in order to get someone else to do something special which would be improper. The two someone's need not be the same.
