Israel under attack

[Roy Bloom]

You're now dismantling your own arguments, and all within a single post

"There's no room!"

"There's room, but it would be tactically stupid to use it!"

You're misrepresenting what I said. I said there's no room, I never implied that there was room. That's totally a dishonest misrepresentation on your part.
But even if there was room, it would be stupid to do so and any military tactician, Brigadier, would be demonstrably stupid to suggest it.

 

[Notch7]

Do Hamas have a uniform?

Ask Roy what he is wearing…..

 

[Roy Bloom]

It was a lot more land than the 1967 borders that people are demanding.

You think the Palestinians are blessed with some super ability to see into the future, so they should have accepted the 1947 UN resolution?
But it's good to see you dismissing Denso's false claim.

 

[Brigadier]

I said there's no room, I never implied that there was room.

And I showed you that there was; just that Hamas wouldn't use it (which I already said would be tactically daft anyway).

You've got some neck, accusing others of misrepresentation; it's how you string out threads for page after page, and yet never move forward.

 

[Roy Bloom]

And I showed you that there was;

There's physically no room to fight a war in London without being involved with civilians.
Unless you evacuated them first. And we've already determined that's not possible or plausible, especially for Gazans.

just that Hamas wouldn't use it (which I already said would be tactically daft anyway).

So we agree, the argument that "Hamas are embedded within the civilian population" is a nonsense argument. It would be military catastrophic to try to fight 'out in the open away from civilians' even if it were physically possibe.
Glad we got that sorted.

You've got some neck, accusing others of misrepresentation; it's how you string out threads for page after page, and yet never move forward.

You started with the misrepresentation.
I just wanted your confirmation that it would be militarily catastrophic for any military to "fight out in the open".
It's a nonsnese accusation designed to justify the killing of civilians.

 

[motorbiking]

It's pretty catastrophic to pick a fight with a vastly superior enemy. What did they think would happen?

 

[Roy Bloom]

It's pretty catastrophic to pick a fight with a vastly superior enemy. What did they think would happen?

Because they feel it's better to die on their feet, than live on their knees.

 

[fillyboy]

You think the Palestinians are blessed with some super ability to see into the future, so they should have accepted the 1947 UN resolution?
But it's good to see you dismissing Denso's false claim.

I don't think the arabs have the brains they were born with and what little thought they have is blinded by their hatred for the Israelis hence turning down the deal of the century.

 

[transam]

Apparently 13 Israeli casualties ( dead) reported ) in Gaza ?? ( army)

It will get worse a lot worse as they actually enter
Gaza city ??

Urban warfare is brutal with high casualty rates ?

Dunno if they have an end plan ?? After potentially destroying Hamas ???

 

[Roy Bloom]

I don't think the arabs have the brains they were born with and what little thought they have is blinded by their hatred for the Israelis hence turning down the deal of the century.

You don't need to repeat your usual racist comments. It was obvious previously.

 

[transam]

Afaik Bolivia have severed diplomatic relations with Isreal ?? Over this caper

Yes exactly who are they ?

 

[fillyboy]

It's pretty catastrophic to pick a fight with a vastly superior enemy. What did they think would happen?

Well, in 1948, when Syria, TransJordan and Iraqi invaded Israel the day after they declared independence, the Israelis defeated the arabs despite not yet having an army or airforce.

Oh, and they snaffled 60% of the land allocated to the arabs.

DOH!

edit: and Egypt.

 

[Brigadier]

I just wanted your confirmation that it would be militarily catastrophic for any military to "fight out in the open

It was I that said this in the first place, but there you go, with your misrepresentation again.........

I'm oot.

 

[Roy Bloom]

It was I that said this in the first place, but there you go, with your misrepresentation again.........

I'm oot.

It's not misrepresentation to demonstrate your misrepresentation.

You're now dismantling your own arguments, and all within a single post

"There's no room!"

"There's room, but it would be tactically stupid to use it!"

 

[denso13]

I find it strange that you can't acknowledge this!

Acknowledge what?

You always come back to Hamas and why they should be disbanded/destroyed before things will change...

I have never once said that.

That's why Hamas came to the fore

Another terrorist sympathiser.