Un ******* believable.

Is it one not allowed to make a comment about an obvious racist motive for someone making prejudicial assumptions, without accusation of being obsessed?
How about the ones who are obsessed with bringing the attention of the forum to issues, that are suggested to be the preserve of one country, religion or race?
Is that not an obsession that concerns you? Doesn't warrant a description of "ranting" or "obsession", in your opinion? Why not?
It is your favourite subject, come on you gotta admit that.

I hope you’ve been keeping well (y)
 
Sponsored Links
So there is a difference between foreign criminals and indigenous criminals?
The difference is obviously their nationality or ethnicity.
If you come to a country for a better life, your behaviour should benifit and not affect for the worse your neighbour. Be them black white Christian or other.
 
It is your favourite subject, come on you gotta admit that.

I hope you’ve been keeping well (y)
Isn't the persistent bringing to the attention of the forum, of foreign born criminals, equally the favourite subject of some posters?
But do you ever mention that?

I hope you're well too.
 
Sponsored Links
If you come to a country for a better life, your behaviour should benifit and not affect for the worse your neighbour. Be them black white Christian or other.
Does that only apply to those born abroad?
Shouldn't it be the obligation of all, irrespective of one's nationality or ethnicity?
 
He wasn’t buried by family but by a Muslim Mosque. I’ve never heard of a Muslim mosque having a whip round to bury a Christian who had turned their back on them, have you?

No I haven't. But that doesn't prove anything either way. It's a total straw man argument.

With proper evidence, I will happily accept that he was still a Muslim.
 
No I haven't. But that doesn't prove anything either way. It's a total straw man argument.

With proper evidence, I will happily accept that he was still a Muslim.
There's already proper evidence that he was a Christian.
The mere fact of anyone professing to be a Christian, could jeopardise their safety and security in some regions, irrespective of the genuineness of the conviction. (Conviction in the sense of religious belief, not in the criminal conviction sense.)

On the basis that some asylum seekers are professing to be Christian, may endanger their safety and security if they are returned to their country of origin.
 
He wasn’t buried by family but by a Muslim Mosque. I’ve never heard of a Muslim mosque having a whip round to bury a Christian who had turned their back on them, have you?

And on reading the article, I've noticed it says

The request for an Islamic burial is believed to have come from friends and family.

I believe what is most likely to have happened is that his family were contacted and they said they wanted an Islamic burial and arrangements were made. But I have no knowledge of the specific mechanisms used in these situations.
 
And on reading the article, I've noticed it says



I believe what is most likely to have happened is that his family were contacted and they said they wanted an Islamic burial and arrangements were made. But I have no knowledge of the specific mechanisms used in these situations.
Going on from my previous comment, it's very possible that the safety and security of his family, in his country of origin, could be endangered if they (those who are capable of endangering others) were aware of a Christian burial.
On that basis, it's understandable that his family requested a Muslim ceremony, and that the Mosque were happy to oblige.
 
Does that only apply to those born abroad?
Shouldn't it be the obligation of all, irrespective of one's nationality or ethnicity?

Your the one making it about colour/ ethnic

I'm about good & bad, regardless of anything.
 
Going on from my previous comment, it's very possible that the safety and security of his family, in his country of origin, could be endangered if they (those who are capable of endangering others) were aware of a Christian burial.
On that basis, it's understandable that his family requested a Muslim ceremony, and that the Mosque were happy to oblige.
What a can of worms we open when we open our doors to these barbaric kind of people.
 
Going on from my previous comment, it's very possible that the safety and security of his family, in his country of origin, could be endangered if they (those who are capable of endangering others) were aware of a Christian burial.
On that basis, it's understandable that his family requested a Muslim ceremony, and that the Mosque were happy to oblige.
Oh yes, they wouldn’t want the acid throwing tunc buried anyway other than in line with their acid throwing religious beliefs, would they?
 
Open your eyes buddy!
Your personal experiences are no substitute for reality.
Have you tried looking for any official data to justify your opinion? Or is just the focus on foreign-born criminals in places, such as this forum, that reinforces your opinion?
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top