It is a consideration but the answer is complex, I don’t think it’s necessarily a given.
Certainly globalisation does mean money can be easily moved around these days + the world is dominated by big business, sadly we can’t just tell Amazon, Google, Apple etc what to do.
The argument being made originally was that asset price inflation in the housing market was a bad thing.
However, house mortgage rates are lower than marine and car finance rates for example, primarily because boats go down in value. Therefore the loan is riskier as the lender's potential loss due to default risk increases over time on a boat/car and reduces over time on a house. Next we have the building industry, which we can see depends on the investment increasing in value to justify the investment.
We don't have to guess.. experts tell us its a fact:
Why are you always seeing the owning of a home as a business venture or from the viewpoint of Rigsby Inc? Many buy or need a house because they need a home, irrespective of what the house market may do.
More false propositions, to support your position.
What is wrong with aspiring, as a nation, that housing is seen as an affordable right for all and owning, a sustainably affordable prospect for those of realistic means?
That housing is a good, safe investment is most of what is wrong with "the market".
The argument being made originally was that asset price inflation in the housing market was a bad thing.
However, house mortgage rates are lower than marine and car finance rates for example, primarily because boats go down in value. Therefore the loan is riskier as the lender's potential loss due to default risk increases over time on a boat/car and reduces over time on a house. Next we have the building industry, which we can see depends on the investment increasing in value to justify the investment.
We don't have to guess.. experts tell us its a fact:
Why are you always seeing the owning of a home as a business venture or from the viewpoint of Rigsby Inc? Many buy or need a house because they need a home, irrespective of what the house market may do.
More false propositions, to support your position.
What is wrong with aspiring, as a nation, that housing is seen as an affordable right for all and owning, a sustainably affordable prospect for those of realistic means?
That housing is a good, safe investment is most of what is wrong with "the market".
For most people it is the single most expensive asset they will ever own. Why is anything wrong, with that being a safe investment. Why would anyone want someone to lose money... their hard earned money on that.
For most people it is the single most expensive asset they will ever own. Why is anything wrong, with that being a safe investment. Why would anyone want someone to lose money... their hard earned money on that.
No one is asserting that anyone should lose money.
But yours is a very selfish, short-term view.
Those of us that have kids, we naturally want to do what we can for them.
Safety and security, good morals, education, that sort of thing.
When helping out with their purchase of first house - using the bullshoite "value" yours has accumulated - becomes a necessity rather than a bonus, where does it logically end?