- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country

Pitiful way to treat fellow human beings, some of whom are in dire need. Even Trump has stopped short of that.Yes.

Pitiful way to treat fellow human beings, some of whom are in dire need. Even Trump has stopped short of that.Yes.

They shouldn’t, if they don't want too.Why should other countries take more
If its that diminutive, then all the other countries who choose to take them should hardly notice the difference.

Remind me how much the UK spent, just last year, on 'housing' these criminals.Yes it's a fantasy
You say they should be detained
Please explain where as jails are full
Morality would dictate that the UK helps a fair share of refugees

Has he?Pitiful way to treat fellow human beings, some of whom are in dire need. Even Trump has stopped short of that.

Yet most boat people who were assessed were given protection because they have valid reasons to seek asylum.Remind me how much the UK spent, just last year, on 'housing' these criminals.

Yes.Has he?
Swerve.Which country do we (the uk) share a border with that is an absolute **** hole?

Don't blame you.Big swerve![]()

It's amazing!Yet most boat people who were assessed were given protection because they have valid reasons to seek asylum.
That’s an open ended exponential problem right there then, isn’t it?It's mostly English language and or family connections.
Don’t care. Not my problemSo the likes of Afghanistan, Iran, Syria and Iraq refugees should all just stop at, say, Turkey? Millions of them?
Saying you don’t want them, doesn’t stop them coming.They shouldn’t, if they don't want to.

At least you're honest.Yes.
Swerve.
Turkey says: we aren’t taking them, not my problem…..UK can take moreDon’t care. Not my problem