- Joined
- 11 Jan 2004
- Messages
- 45,851
- Reaction score
- 3,513
- Country

Fair enough. But for those who enjoy it, it's not cruel.Seems cruel to me

Fair enough. But for those who enjoy it, it's not cruel.Seems cruel to me

Whatever floats ya boatFair enough. But for those who enjoy it, it's not cruel.

I had to read this twice as it looks like you had said I thinkI did both!!!!!!I think it did both. Made future same sex marriages legal and recognised existing same sex marriages which had occurred in other jurisdictions.

I agree but have you noticed he is not very good at it.Liar nosenout. Trolling for an argument as usual.
Eh?
Can two women have a child?
Can two men have a child?
There's your answer![]()

I bet your long-suffering teachers used to write things like "He will do anything in pursuit of a laugh..." on your reports....!I think I've diagnosed the cause of your recurring UTIs............
Blatant trollingI agree but have you noticed he is not very good at it.

thank youBlatant trolling
Correct. Never was and still isn't and probably never will be."never deemed illegal in the eyes of the law"



How many lawful same sex marriages were there during the DOMA years?Funny how the meaning of illegal gets muddled up with 'recognised'.
As I said, same sex marriage was never illegal.
How many same sex marriages were prosecuted during the DOMA years.
I'll wait...
How many lawful same sex marriages were there during the DOMA years?
The same number as the number of Muslim Nikah marriages allowing the benefits of marriage in the UK. Zero
I wonder what it means for a state to Ban something.![]()