UFO / UAP

[denso13]

Lots of archaeology, is based upon fitting 100% theories, to fit the 5% of evidence of what we see - mostly guesswork

Sorry, that's just more gut feelings and bears no resemblance to reality.

 

[Harry Bloomfield]

Nope, all well understood

https://web.mae.ufl.edu/uhk/pyramid-technology.pdf

100,000 men, working a 10 hour day, for 20 years. Who sweeps the streets, cooks the food, grows the crops, makes the pots and pans, collects the fire wood? Where do they get 100,000 men from, in the first place?

 

[Harry Bloomfield]

Sorry, that's just more gut feelings and bears no resemblance to reality.

Your usual nonsense, just to get attention I see!

 

[denso13]

100,000 men, working a 10 hour day, for 20 years. Who sweeps the streets, cooks the food, grows the crops, makes the pots and pans, collects the fire wood? Where do they get 100,000 men from, in the first place?

They got them in Egypt I suspect. They have already uncovered the camps they lived in and shown how they were fed. That's all on record. No guesswork.

 

[denso13]

Your usual nonsense, just to get attention I see!

You really think that's how science works? 5% of a theory is factual and the rest is guesswork? That's ludicrous.

 

[Harry Bloomfield]

You really think that's how science works? 5% of a theory is factual and the rest is guesswork? That's ludicrous.

Not quite what I said, is it past your bedtime!

 

[denso13]

Not quite what I said, is it past your bedtime!

Lots of archaeology, is based upon fitting 100% theories, to fit the 5% of evidence of what we see - mostly guesswork,

 

[IT Minion]

It's just an idea/theory like yours.

To be a scientific theory it has to be possible to prove it isn't true.

For example of you found a UFO buried under the great pyramid and it contained recordings then you'd prove the Egyptians as builders theory to be false. So it meets that test.

But there is nothing than can disprove the 'aliens did it' argument. No evidence can be provided to disprove it.

 

[Odds]

This all reads like an episode of 'Drunk History'.

 

[noseall]

The fact of the matter is this. Nobody knows who built the Pyramids.

Only that we know it wasn't aliens.

It may have been the Egyptians

They are in Egypt, so well done you.

but realistically it was a much more advanced civilisation than the egyptians

?

. Everything including the archeologists are basing their beliefs on artifacts found and a few scrolls

That and a wealth of information in respect to the construction of pyramids over the centuries.

but these do not reveal how they built them or what for, it is all assumption.

It doesn't say (by name) who erected the scaffolding and who the chief mason was, no.

The more likely and more believable theory of aliens building them is a serious consideration.

No it isn't. In terms of say a million possibilities, that would rank second from last, just ahead of ghosts and spooks.

 

[noseall]

This all reads like an episode of 'Drunk History'.

I don't think their ideas are any more plausible when they are sober.

 

[Odds]

I don't think their ideas are any more plausible when they are sober.

I think KoolPC has been at the catnip.

 

[noseall]

A theory, like I know I've got an idea but it could be wrong?

View attachment 380584

"...intended to explain fact or events..." I can see where you lot have missed a step.

Most folk, once armed with the facts, tend to make reasonable assumptions. Like the fact that no aliens have the ability to travel to Earth in the same way we can't reach the nearest (potential) inhabited planet. A pretty big stumbling block in the effort to"..explain fact or events..."


Lol.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

Not according to the experts.

They are not experts though, they’ve taken money, and wrote a paper/s based on the last bloke.

Joseph Davidovits​

Joseph Davidovits - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

His work/theory was disregarded. I can’t think of a simpler way to explain the stone work on a pyramid face.

It makes far more sense than a Fooking copper chisel!

 

[pete01]

"...intended to explain fact or events..." I can see where you lot have missed a step.

Most folk, once armed with the facts, tend to make reasonable assumptions. Like the fact that no aliens have the ability to travel to Earth in the same way we can't reach the nearest (potential) inhabited planet. A pretty big stumbling block in the effort to"..explain fact or events..."


Lol.

But in the end just an idea.....

Edit

Oh oh wait I forgot...lol.