I amongst many do not believe that they are, you don't see many families fleeing here in small boats, they are mainly young men of fighting age. Genuine families, yes we have an obligation to allow them temporary status, young men to be processed away from our shores. They are a serious security risk to us.
But you don't mean processed, you mean deported.
Well the evidence proves you wrong.
You think none of these "assylum seekers" are not terrorists or potentially could be then?
Then process them before they get here, with more safe routes to filter out genuine refugees.
That doesn't happen, they pay traffikers aprox 5k to get here. Doesn't sound too much like genuine assylum seekers to me.
Because there is no other way. Process them properly before they get to the boats.
That doesn't happen therefore it is an invalid argument.
Same with Rwanda then.
Rwanda is in place
Based on bias.
That’s because women, children and elderly lack the stamina for the arduous, dangerous journey.
tired trope.
No it isn't, the agreement has been cancelled.
it is a valid argument
I'm not allowed to say what I think should be in place? Good grief...
Great idea allowing unvetted people with no background checks simply arriving here and housing them, if 40.000 appear and only 1% of them are terrorists, imagine the devastation they could wreak on our island. You have seen the devastation that a single terrorist can cause, now times that by thousands of them,. yes a really good idea and well worth putting the country at risk for. Stop talking silly.
