UFO / UAP

[IT Minion]

It’s all over the internet, take your pick.

Here’s something from the penn museum

https://www.penn.museum/documents/publications/expedition/25-3/Ancient.pdf

No, I wanted the source for your quote because I don't trust some of the assertions made in it.

 

[IT Minion]

It’s all over the internet, take your pick.

Here’s something from the penn museum

https://www.penn.museum/documents/publications/expedition/25-3/Ancient.pdf

It's interesting you quote that article. In there the granite holes that were drilled were very sloppy compared to modern tooling. 1cm error after 24cm?

I can't remember if you were one of the 'better than we can do now' crowd but that's an example of them falling below modern standards. Which is to be expected of course.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

No, I wanted the source for your quote because I don't trust some of the assertions made in it.

The source the link shows the source.

It’s widely known, there’s plenty more sources to back up mine.

If you don’t trust the penn museum, not much I can do.

I will say you’re a bad loser.

 

[denso13]

No, I wanted the source for your quote because I don't trust some of the assertions made in it.

They are just trolling for the sake of it now. If you had authenticated photos and videos they'd still deny it. Shame...

 

[Deleted member 317777]

It's interesting you quote that article. In there the granite holes that were drilled were very sloppy compared to modern tooling. 1cm error after 24cm?

And what’s the run out with modern hand core drills then lol.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

They are just trolling for the sake of it now. If you had authenticated photos and videos they'd still deny it. Shame...

You agreed the core drill sample is still out for debate.

Who’s the real Troll….

 

[IT Minion]

And what’s the run out with modern hand core drills then lol.

Who gives a ****, if it were modern tools you'd use power tools. That the Egyptians were probably better with hand tools than modern tradesmen shouldn't be a shocker.

The quality of the machining is not suspicious.

 

[denso13]

You agreed the core drill sample is still out for debate.

Yes, on how the Egyptians did it. There is no mention of someone else doing it.

Don't twist my words please.

 

[IT Minion]

The source the link shows the source.

It’s widely known, there’s plenty more sources to back up mine.

If you don’t trust the penn museum, not much I can do.

I will say you’re a bad loser.

Liar liar pants on fire, that link doesn't contain what you had quoted.

It isn't even an analysis of the core itself, it's a different artifact being investigated.

 

[noseall]

Liar liar pants on fire, that link doesn't contain what you had quoted.

nwgs is a renowned troll. And proud of it.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

It's interesting you quote that article. In there the granite holes that were drilled were very sloppy compared to modern tooling. 1cm error after 24cm?

I can't remember if you were one of the 'better than we can do now' crowd but that's an example of them falling below modern standards. Which is to be expected of course.

1. The drilling was done entirely from one end with a relatively slight taper. Over the 24 cm. length of the drill hole there was only 1 cm. or 4% narrowing, indicating very little wear and wobble of the drill. This shape suggested the use of a tubular drill and will be discussed later.

Only “you” used the word “error”

That was sad, even by your standards. I’m disappointed

In face the part I’ve quoted states its very accurate.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

Liar liar pants on fire, that link doesn't contain what you had quoted.

The only liar is you.

Unless you’ve read the article incorrectly, you probably have.

Core 7 is famous and still out for debate.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

No, I wanted the source for your quote because I don't trust some of the assertions made in it.

Google Search

It’s a google search! Are you calling google a liar now ?

 

[IT Minion]

1. The drilling was done entirely from one end with a relatively slight taper. Over the 24 cm. length of the drill hole there was only 1 cm. or 4% narrowing, indicating very little wear and wobble of the drill. This shape suggested the use of a tubular drill and will be discussed later.

Only “you” used the word “error”

That was sad, even by your standards. I’m disappointed

What 'error' are you gibbering about? it's not in the quote.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

What 'error' are you gibbering about? it's not in the quote.

It's interesting you quote that article. In there the granite holes that were drilled were very sloppy compared to modern tooling. 1cm error after 24cm?

I can't remember if you were one of the 'better than we can do now' crowd but that's an example of them falling below modern standards. Which is to be expected of course.

What 'error' are you gibbering about? it's not in the quote.

The one you mentioned above!

Where you’ve tried to manipulate what was actually written.