for god sakes. It isn't the fact of the seriousness of the injuries caused. He wasn't trying to avoid any injuries, it is either attempted murder or murder if nobody died, the latter will / should apply.
Ok. There are people on this thread trying to claim it was an accident though, I'm not. Let's see what happens without deciding it beforehand.
www.nytimes.com
When I first heard of it I did think maybe he passed out or had a heart attack but apparently he was following an ambulance through the crowds?
They had to lift 4 people out from under the car, two of which were children. I don't think there is much doubt on his intention.
Seems like it, but I don't think we know all the facts yet. The imminent charges should tell us more.
he got through a closed road by the police who let an ambulance through to aid a chap who was having a suspected heart attack. They failed to shut the road off again afterwards and this moron went through and was traveling against the crowd.
It's because he's white and they can't bear that fact.
don't be silly.
Motoring offences are slightly different. Here the results affect the crime. Dangerous driving vs Death by dangerous driving for example. The actions and intentions could be the same.
