Ssssssshhhhhh, don't mention Reform.

the one telling lies is you and your feeble atempt to call my posts misinformation is dishonest.
your posts are misinformation

you have falsely claimed dozens of times that pushbacks are legal without acknowledging that small inflatable boats full of people are not very seaworthy and could sink at any time............so in most cases pushbacks are being done against a boat in distress


why do you continue this misinformation when you know its wrong
 
more lies

you cant tow it to France without their agreement.
of course you can, if its already in French waters. A vessel without propulsion needs assistance. It is not a distress situation, the towing vessel has no responsibility for the state of status of the people in the vessel he is towing.

You have zero knowledge and you are just talking boll@x.
 
your posts are misinformation

you have falsely claimed dozens of times that pushbacks are legal without acknowledging that small inflatable boats full of people are not very seaworthy and could sink at any time............so in most cases pushbacks are being done against a boat in distress


why do you continue this misinformation when you know its wrong
You repeatedly fail to understand what being in distress is and you just make it up.
 
So you deliberately put the boat in a distress situation, in French waters, all so you can take them back to France, who will welcome you with open arms?

Ok.
No danger involved it isn't in distress other than they cannot continue their journey, so tow back to France
 
of course you can, if its already in French waters. A vessel without propulsion needs assistance. It is not a distress situation, the towing vessel has no responsibility for the state of status of the people in the vessel he is towing.

You have zero knowledge and you are just talking boll@x.
more misinformation and lies from Motorbiking

here you are saying:

A) a vessel without propulsion needs assistance
B) but it is not a distress situation
C) you cant just leave the boat drifting

if a boat is not in distress then it can be left, if it cant then it is


the towing vessel has no responsibility for the state of status of the people in the vessel he is towing.
the towing vessel has a responsibility to contact the "contracting state" which will then coordinate

the towing vessel can not take it to a French port

I suggest you read SOLAS 33, you dont seem very familiar with the rules
 
more misinformation and lies from Motorbiking

here you are saying:

A) a vessel without propulsion needs assistance
B) but it is not a distress situation
C) you cant just leave the boat drifting

if a boat is not in distress then it can be left, if it cant then it is



the towing vessel has a responsibility to contact the "contracting state" which will then coordinate

the towing vessel can not take it to a French port

I suggest you read SOLAS 33, you dont seem very familiar with the rules
deja vue
 
You repeatedly fail to understand what being in distress is and you just make it up.
how do you know whether an inflatable boat not designed for the channel and massively overloaded with people is not in immediate danger

you dont
 
I think both were funded by Quantitative Easing..........that causes its own problems

if you are talking about MMT then thats a tricky question, but I would simply ask why dont politicians use it in their manifestos
MMT snd QE are two sides of the same coin funded by lending.
 
you clearly know absolutely nothing because you never offer any counter argument
I did about 60 pages ago, then MBK put you right so what is the point of continuing when you are now going round in circles.
 
MMT snd QE are two sides of the same coin funded by lending.
they are conceptually very different

QE involves creating money to purchase government bonds its been a major component of increasing wealth inequality

MMT isnt really the same as its just moving money around on a balance sheet
 
how do you know whether an inflatable boat not designed for the channel and massively overloaded with people is not in immediate danger

you dont

If people are not in the water and or the vessel is not sinking. It’s up to the skipper of the boat to raise a distress call.

If you knew anything about the subject you’d know this.

If they are “deemed” in distress, then the French coastguard, navy etc escorting them must rescue them.
 
If people are not in the water and or the vessel is not sinking. It’s up to the skipper of the boat to raise a distress call.

If you knew anything about the subject you’d know this.

If they are “deemed” in distress, then the French coastguard, navy etc escorting them must rescue them.
And that is that, but no doubt Notch will quote some law that doesnt apply and get it all wrong.
 
Back
Top