more liesSo just leave it drifting about until people start drowning?
Give your head a shake
you cant tow it to France without their agreement.
and you definitely cant nobble a boat then tow it to France
more liesSo just leave it drifting about until people start drowning?
Give your head a shake
your posts are misinformationthe one telling lies is you and your feeble atempt to call my posts misinformation is dishonest.

of course you can, if its already in French waters. A vessel without propulsion needs assistance. It is not a distress situation, the towing vessel has no responsibility for the state of status of the people in the vessel he is towing.more lies
you cant tow it to France without their agreement.

You repeatedly fail to understand what being in distress is and you just make it up.your posts are misinformation
you have falsely claimed dozens of times that pushbacks are legal without acknowledging that small inflatable boats full of people are not very seaworthy and could sink at any time............so in most cases pushbacks are being done against a boat in distress
why do you continue this misinformation when you know its wrong

No danger involved it isn't in distress other than they cannot continue their journey, so tow back to FranceSo you deliberately put the boat in a distress situation, in French waters, all so you can take them back to France, who will welcome you with open arms?
Ok.
more misinformation and lies from Motorbikingof course you can, if its already in French waters. A vessel without propulsion needs assistance. It is not a distress situation, the towing vessel has no responsibility for the state of status of the people in the vessel he is towing.
You have zero knowledge and you are just talking boll@x.
the towing vessel has a responsibility to contact the "contracting state" which will then coordinatethe towing vessel has no responsibility for the state of status of the people in the vessel he is towing.

deja vuemore misinformation and lies from Motorbiking
here you are saying:
A) a vessel without propulsion needs assistance
B) but it is not a distress situation
C) you cant just leave the boat drifting
if a boat is not in distress then it can be left, if it cant then it is
the towing vessel has a responsibility to contact the "contracting state" which will then coordinate
the towing vessel can not take it to a French port
I suggest you read SOLAS 33, you dont seem very familiar with the rules
how do you know whether an inflatable boat not designed for the channel and massively overloaded with people is not in immediate dangerYou repeatedly fail to understand what being in distress is and you just make it up.
MMT snd QE are two sides of the same coin funded by lending.I think both were funded by Quantitative Easing..........that causes its own problems
if you are talking about MMT then thats a tricky question, but I would simply ask why dont politicians use it in their manifestos
you clearly know absolutely nothing because you never offer any counter argumentdeja vue

I did about 60 pages ago, then MBK put you right so what is the point of continuing when you are now going round in circles.you clearly know absolutely nothing because you never offer any counter argument

Yep its a PanPan.No danger involved it isn't in distress other than they cannot continue their journey, so tow back to France
they are conceptually very differentMMT snd QE are two sides of the same coin funded by lending.

how do you know whether an inflatable boat not designed for the channel and massively overloaded with people is not in immediate danger
you dont

And that is that, but no doubt Notch will quote some law that doesnt apply and get it all wrong.If people are not in the water and or the vessel is not sinking. It’s up to the skipper of the boat to raise a distress call.
If you knew anything about the subject you’d know this.
If they are “deemed” in distress, then the French coastguard, navy etc escorting them must rescue them.