Why cant you say which Reform policies you like particularly?And again. Keep asking but the answer will be the same. It’s only yourself that is looking stupid and childish.
View attachment 383344
whats the problem?
Why cant you say which Reform policies you like particularly?And again. Keep asking but the answer will be the same. It’s only yourself that is looking stupid and childish.
View attachment 383344
Yawn.Why cant you say which Reform policies you like particularly?
whats the problem?

read paragraph 2, 3. 4 and 9. His pants were on fire.yes I read the case and no he did not say he "made it all up" -thats a lie
I cant see middle class traditional small c Conservatives changing to ReformI'm not talking about reasonable people who are now considering Reform out of desperation.
Mottie, you are now a keen supporter of the Reform party, so please can you say which of their policies you are particularly keen on
I cant see middle class traditional small c Conservatives changing to Reform
I cant see Reform getting more votes from that demographic, which is why Reform are going after Labour voters, but do they watch GBnews?
Its not likely that those who voted remain will ever vote for Farage
And again. Keep asking if you've nothing better in your life to do.Mottie, you are now a keen supporter of the Reform party, so please can you say which of their policies you are particularly keen on
Their right to stay in the UK is limited.what did you mean by finite?
A right to claim is not evidence they get granted leave to remain.No the argument is that they can fake some mental illness with a risk of suicide and the fact there is no affordable healthcare in their home country - gives them a right to claim
The original asylum claim.read paragraph 2, 3. 4 and 9. His pants were on fire.
the Appellant accepted, in a statement dated 16 December 2003, that that claim was a fabricated account.
You literally wont accept the words written.
You are to embarrassed to say which Reform policies you like.

You said you could not find any evidence there were any. I think you now understand that you weren't looking in the right place.A right to claim is not evidence they get granted leave to remain.
because his pants were on fire. He was going through the play book. Every case costs the tax payer a fortune.Example:
“7. Dr Gamble concluded that the Appellant was not suffering from a depressive or psychotic disorder nor from PTSD. His symptoms of anxiety and insomnia were a normal psychological response to uncertainty over the possibility of return”
you havent been looking in the right place either as youve not provided the evidenceYou said you could not find any evidence there were any. I think you know understand that you weren't looking in the right place.
Ah so you admit that people who make fake claims do not simply win their casebecause his pants were on fire. He was going through the play book. Every case costs the tax payer a fortune.

stop lying.you havent been looking in the right place either as youve not provided the evidence
Ah so you admit that people who make fake claims do not simply win their case
"they just claim theyve got mental illness and they can stay" says Motorbiking