Kasper Eriksen, arrested, shackled, thrown in prison by Trumps gestapo.

Why cant you say which Reform policies you like particularly?

whats the problem?
Yawn.

IMG_7752.png
 
yes I read the case and no he did not say he "made it all up" -thats a lie
read paragraph 2, 3. 4 and 9. His pants were on fire.

the Appellant accepted, in a statement dated 16 December 2003, that that claim was a fabricated account.

You literally wont accept the words written.
 
I'm not talking about reasonable people who are now considering Reform out of desperation.
I cant see middle class traditional small c Conservatives changing to Reform

I cant see Reform getting more votes from that demographic, which is why Reform are going after Labour voters, but do they watch GBnews?

Its not likely that those who voted remain will ever vote for Farage
 
I cant see middle class traditional small c Conservatives changing to Reform

I cant see Reform getting more votes from that demographic, which is why Reform are going after Labour voters, but do they watch GBnews?

Its not likely that those who voted remain will ever vote for Farage

I honestly don't know. As I have posted before, most of the West is massively unhappy and the real reasons are not yet fully understood. Farage and the other populists are pushing simplistic fantasies. But many reasonable people might decide that is better than facing tough choices.
 
Mottie, you are now a keen supporter of the Reform party, so please can you say which of their policies you are particularly keen on
And again. Keep asking if you've nothing better in your life to do.

IMG_7751.jpeg
 
Many on the right praise Australia's immigration system and want to copy it. They are also a little bit wealthier than us. But they are just as unhappy.
 
No the argument is that they can fake some mental illness with a risk of suicide and the fact there is no affordable healthcare in their home country - gives them a right to claim
A right to claim is not evidence they get granted leave to remain.

Example:

“7. Dr Gamble concluded that the Appellant was not suffering from a depressive or psychotic disorder nor from PTSD. His symptoms of anxiety and insomnia were a normal psychological response to uncertainty over the possibility of return”
 
read paragraph 2, 3. 4 and 9. His pants were on fire.

the Appellant accepted, in a statement dated 16 December 2003, that that claim was a fabricated account.

You literally wont accept the words written.
The original asylum claim.

Not the one based on his mental health.
 
A right to claim is not evidence they get granted leave to remain.
You said you could not find any evidence there were any. I think you now understand that you weren't looking in the right place.
Example:

“7. Dr Gamble concluded that the Appellant was not suffering from a depressive or psychotic disorder nor from PTSD. His symptoms of anxiety and insomnia were a normal psychological response to uncertainty over the possibility of return”
because his pants were on fire. He was going through the play book. Every case costs the tax payer a fortune.
 
Last edited:
You said you could not find any evidence there were any. I think you know understand that you weren't looking in the right place.
you havent been looking in the right place either as youve not provided the evidence

because his pants were on fire. He was going through the play book. Every case costs the tax payer a fortune.
Ah so you admit that people who make fake claims do not simply win their case

"they just claim theyve got mental illness and they can stay" says Motorbiking
 
you havent been looking in the right place either as youve not provided the evidence


Ah so you admit that people who make fake claims do not simply win their case

"they just claim theyve got mental illness and they can stay" says Motorbiking
stop lying.
 
Back
Top