As opposed to a 'one trade union one vote' system.Farage's company operates a "one man, one vote" system.
He's the one man
And he has the one vote.
As opposed to a 'one trade union one vote' system.Farage's company operates a "one man, one vote" system.
He's the one man
And he has the one vote.

They may have started like that, but a focus on the Limited company is nothing more than FUD. I found Reform's 17 page rule book a lot easier to follow than Labour's 138 page one.That's because it isn't a party composed of members, it's a company controlled by shareholders.
Farage's company operates a "one man, one vote" system.
He's the one man
And he has the one vote.

They would be right though.Everything. The shortage and cost of housing, the problems with the NHS etc. etc. etc. Essentially, with these people, any problem you discuss facing the country, they always manage to turn it round to being caused by immigration. In my experience. I mean the die hard base, here.

Calling them far-right because they endorse the statements of Tommy Robinson is why they end up going around in court circles.They would be right though.
Adding a few million people to the population in less than a decade is going to cause a shortage of housing and put strain on the health service.
Couple that with the fact that most immigrants are low skilled, which causes wages to stagnate (or even fall in many sectors) and the rising house prices are even less affordable.
Calling people racist for noticing problems is a large part of why very little is ever done to address the problems.
Do you support Unions that fight for better pay and conditions for British workers?Couple that with the fact that most immigrants are low skilled, which causes wages to stagnate (or even fall in many sectors)
Certainly population growth rate was too high in 2023 at 1.0%Adding a few million people to the population in less than a decade is going to cause a shortage of housing and put strain on the health service.

Population growth has been too high for the last 20years, ever since Blair opened the gates and welcomed everyone in.Certainly population growth rate was too high in 2023 at 1.0%
But for the last decade average population growth rate was around 0.7% which is lower than the baby boom years of early 1960s where growth rate was over 0.8%
Whilst you are correct that high immigration causes strain on housing and NHS, it is wrong to talk about it as though was the only problem. In reality it is one factor of many.
And let’s not forget, there was a housing crisis and an NHS crisis a decade ago.
There was no housing crisis in the 1970s when 30% of houses were council owned.
The Reform party are only interested in tackling immigration, but that alone won’t solve housing crisis nor NHS….as there are other bigger factors (which Reform would only make worse)
Lirefighter, please take a broader view rather than just focusing on immigrants
How was the leader of the party elected?They follow the same rules as all the other parties.
Population growth has been too high for the last 20years, ever since Blair opened the gates and welcomed everyone in.

I don't think there was a plan, they simply didn't impose caps on the expansion of the EU.That is a sensible argument. But we have to understand why it was thought we needed the immigration. Many would argue that it was the long term consequences of moving to what became known as the Anglo Saxon economic model in the 1980s. We privatised, outsourced, offshored, destroyed unions, let house prices explode and created a hollowed out economy. We probably are richer as a whole, but we may have been happier being poorer and more at ease with ourselves. These are massive and complex questions. Blaming unhappiness on immigration is far too simplistic.

Fear not, he cannot lead a government without the confidence of parliament and if he resigns, Reform (assuming they are in government) cannot stay in power without support from the MPs.How was the leader of the party elected?

Do they need better pay and conditions?Do you support Unions that fight for better pay and conditions for British workers?
which operator do you have in mind?For example RMT Union fighting for train workers (not drivers), where the train operators make big profits whilst pushing for lower maintenance schedules and poor pay for British workers?
I don't think there was a plan, they simply didn't impose caps on the expansion of the EU.