Yes it is true, Netanyahu is starting another war to keep himself out of prison
Iran
- Thread starter fillyboy
- Start date
- Joined
- 11 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 4,491
- Reaction score
- 2,225
- Country
"Global news channel" Lol.
Some foreign ejit sitting in his bedroom mentally masturbating at the prospect of death and destuction of innocent people.
Influential conservative commentator Tucker Carlson — seen as a major figure in Trump’s Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement — said the US should not support the “war-hungry government” of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
“If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so. It is a sovereign country, and it can do as it pleases. But not with America’s backing,” the Tucker Carlson Network morning newsletter read on Friday. It added that a war with Iran could “fuel the next generation of terrorism” or lead to the killing of thousands of Americans in the name of a foreign agenda.
“It goes without saying that neither of those possibilities would be beneficial for the United States,” the newsletter said. “But there is another option: drop Israel. Let them fight their own wars.” - a recent Pew Research Center survey that suggested 50 percent of Republicans under the age of 50 have an unfavourable view of Israel.
Al Jazeera
“If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so. It is a sovereign country, and it can do as it pleases. But not with America’s backing,” the Tucker Carlson Network morning newsletter read on Friday. It added that a war with Iran could “fuel the next generation of terrorism” or lead to the killing of thousands of Americans in the name of a foreign agenda.
“It goes without saying that neither of those possibilities would be beneficial for the United States,” the newsletter said. “But there is another option: drop Israel. Let them fight their own wars.” - a recent Pew Research Center survey that suggested 50 percent of Republicans under the age of 50 have an unfavourable view of Israel.
Al Jazeera
Alternatively, it could lead to the demise of Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis and set up Iran as a democracy working for the benefit of it's people.
Wasn't that the plan for Iraq?
Lets just hope that Iran doesn't get nuclear weapons, if those missiles that hit Tel Aviv last night had been carrying nuclear warheads instead of conventional ones, the outcome would have been too horrific to contemplate.
Exactly.
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 13,529
- Reaction score
- 7,812
- Country
Exactly why Iran should never be allowed to have a nuclear program.
I pointed out earlier in the thread that no other nation has used a nuclear bomb and only fearmongering suggests Iran would be any different.
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 13,529
- Reaction score
- 7,812
- Country
If Iran had nuclear weapons it wouldn't be a deterrent for them, they would most certainly be threatening the world.
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 13,529
- Reaction score
- 7,812
- Country
You think Iran should have nukes?
Copy and pasted.
A study published in the Journal of Conflict Resolution in 2009 quantitatively evaluated the nuclear peace hypothesis and found support for the existence of the stability-instability paradox. The study determined that nuclear weapons promote strategic stability and prevent large-scale wars but simultaneously allow for more low intensity conflicts. If a nuclear monopoly exists between two states, and one state has nuclear weapons and its opponent does not, there is a greater chance of war. In contrast, if there is mutual nuclear weapon ownership with both states possessing nuclear weapons, the odds of war drop precipitously.
So it seems the smart thing would be to let Iran have nukes, then there would be less war and unnecessary death.
A study published in the Journal of Conflict Resolution in 2009 quantitatively evaluated the nuclear peace hypothesis and found support for the existence of the stability-instability paradox. The study determined that nuclear weapons promote strategic stability and prevent large-scale wars but simultaneously allow for more low intensity conflicts. If a nuclear monopoly exists between two states, and one state has nuclear weapons and its opponent does not, there is a greater chance of war. In contrast, if there is mutual nuclear weapon ownership with both states possessing nuclear weapons, the odds of war drop precipitously.
So it seems the smart thing would be to let Iran have nukes, then there would be less war and unnecessary death.
