Ssssssshhhhhh, don't mention Reform.

[Highway Man]

I don’t support small boats coming here, I wish they didn’t

Please avoid conflating pointing out the facts with support.

As you have pleaded with me, I will think about it

 

[noseall]

you don't even understand what is being discussed.. as usual.

Show an instance where your fantasy has occurred.

I believe those that understand law. You are just a lying moron.

Read more here

 

[motorbiking]

Andrew Serdy, a maritime legal expert says “UK authorities would not be allowed in France's territorial waters without consent”

Professor Andrew Serdy​

Prof of the Public Intntl Law of the Sea

Andrew Leslie Serdy | University of Southampton

Professor Andrew Serdy is a Prof of the Public Intntl Law of the Sea at the University of Southampton

www.southampton.ac.uk

no link to his statement? Is it because he said something different?

 

[motorbiking]

A British border force entering French waters to do pushbacks is not innocent passage.

British border force needs permission from France unless it is carrying out a rescue

your interpretation is not detailed in article 19.

 

[motorbiking]

Show an instance where your fantasy has occurred.

I believe those that understand law. You are just a lying moron.

Thank you for showing you have no idea about what is being discussed. Nobody is discussing "take backs" and nobody has said, Reform's version can work without tweaks.

From your link:

"However, the UK government's lawyers say turning boats back would be legal in limited and specific circumstances"

oof you might say

Read more here

yes we know labour have no plan and pretend that illegals haven't risen 42% this year. Even Notch denies it.

 

[Notch7]

your interpretation is not detailed in article 19.

Motorbikings grift has now lead him to deny basic facts





Passage of a foreign ship,shall be considered prejudicial to the peace, good order or security of the coastal state if:

(l) any other activity not having a direct bearing on passage

Taking British vessel into French waters with the intention of doing pushbacks is not “direct passage”

Motorbiking is resorting to denying facts now.

 

[Notch7]

no link to his statement? Is it because he said something different?

UK authorities would not be allowed in France's territorial waters without consent and that could cause problems, says Prof Andrew Serdy, a law of the sea expert.

Who rescues migrants in the Channel?

The number of migrants crossing the English Channel is increasing, but who is responsible for them?

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[Notch7]

oof you might say

Do you know what “limited and specific circumstances” means?

What it means is very rarely, so in other words it destroys your argument of saying pushbacks are legal


"However, the UK government's lawyers say turning boats back would be legal in limited and specific circumstances




Motorbiking, it’s time you gave up your grift, you’ve been comprehensively beaten in which way possible, because what you claim doesn’t match reality.

 

[motorbiking]

Motorbikings grift has now lead him to deny basic facts





Passage of a foreign ship,shall be considered prejudicial to the peace, good order or security of the coastal state if:

(l) any other activity not having a direct bearing on passage

Taking British vessel into French waters with the intention of doing pushbacks is not “direct passage”

View attachment 384267

Motorbiking is resorting to denying facts now.

You keep posting Article 19, saying it prevents UK authorities from preventing illegal immigrant boats from entering UK waters. But it is the specific article that defines them (the illegal immigrants) as passage that is not innocent allowing them to take the necessary steps according to article 25. Nowhere in Article 19 does it define the activity of preventing entry to adjacent territorial waters as passage that is not innocent.

 

[motorbiking]

UK authorities would not be allowed in France's territorial waters without consent and that could cause problems, says Prof Andrew Serdy, a law of the sea expert.

Who rescues migrants in the Channel?

The number of migrants crossing the English Channel is increasing, but who is responsible for them?

www.bbc.co.uk

Which is nonsense, without context.

 

[motorbiking]

Do you know what “limited and specific circumstances” means?

What it means is very rarely, so in other words it destroys your argument of saying pushbacks are legal


"However, the UK government's lawyers say turning boats back would be legal in limited and specific circumstances




Motorbiking, it’s time you gave up your grift, you’ve been comprehensively beaten in which way possible, because what you claim doesn’t match reality.

Only in your sawdust filled head.

Nothing stops the UK authorities taking the necessary steps to prevent illegal immigrant boats from entering UK waters. It's that simple. Nobody is suggesting that boats can be picked up in UK waters and taken back to France and nobody is suggesting UK boats can enter French waters to intercept illegal boats, unless they are in distress. They can of course be turned around on the border and France can take no action to stop it. Unless they want to also sit on their border and play illegal migrant table tennis.

 

[Notch7]

You keep posting Article 19, saying it prevents UK authorities from preventing illegal immigrant boats from entering UK waters. But it is the specific article that defines them (the illegal immigrants) as passage that is not innocent allowing them to take the necessary steps according to article 25. Nowhere in Article 19 does it define the activity of preventing entry to adjacent territorial waters as passage that is not innocent.

Please show me on this image where the border between France and British territorial waters runs

 

[Notch7]

Which is nonsense, without context.

The context is all there.

British Border force can’t take back migrant boats from British waters to French coast

British Border force can’t enter French territorial water without permission to engage in activities that do not comply with innocent passage

 

[Notch7]

Nobody is suggesting that boats can be picked up in UK waters and taken back to France and nobody is suggesting UK boats can enter French waters to intercept illegal boats, unless they are in distress

In the scenario in image below please state in which territorial sea (British or French) you think the migrant boat and the 2 Border force ski jet boats are

 

[JP_]

The world is laughing at Greta, it is a shame but she has opened herself up to the humiliation.

Not the world, just a vocal minority.

As of 4 June, 57,000 people have died in this war. That more outrage has been expressed online over a 22-year-old Swedish woman attempting to help those who are suffering is a damning indictment of where we are.