10 facts about immigration?

[MNW67]

the law means nothing - righto.

No. Your use of it means nothing when you don't understand it.

Go back to the scenarios I put forward last night. I actually think we were getting somewhere. But you didn't respond.

 

[motorbiking]

No. Your use of it means nothing when you don't understand it.

and the met police, they don't understand it either.. give your head a shake.

 

[denso13]

I dont really give a shyzza

And yet here you are, bumping your gums about it, which is pointless in the extreme.

 

[MNW67]

and the met police, they don't understand it either.. give your head a shake.

Go back to the scenarios I put forward last night which we were discussing. I actually think we were getting somewhere. But you didn't respond.

 

[motorbiking]

Go back to the scenarios I put forward last night which we were discussing. I actually think we were getting somewhere. But you didn't respond.

post numbers? pls

 

[pete01]

And yet here you are, bumping your gums about it, which is pointless in the extreme.

Im watching keeping up appearances (I know) and messing with this on the side...watch my lips....I DONT CARE

 

[MNW67]

and the met police, they don't understand it either.. give your head a shake.

All it means is that if somebody says they have been upset by something they believe is hate speech, the police have to investigate. It doesn't make it racist.

 

[MNW67]

post numbers? pls

#245

 

[Brigadier]

the law means nothing - righto.

"Investigating" ain't "the law".

 

[motorbiking]

"Investigating" ain't "the law".

s17 and 18 of the public order act are. Feel free to read it, feel free to argue the point, having done so.

 

[motorbiking]

All it means is that if somebody says they have been upset by something they believe is hate speech, the police have to investigate. It doesn't make it racist.

What definition would you call an abusive statement based on a person's skin colour intended to stir hatred toward that group?

 

[MNW67]

What definition would you call an abusive statement based on a person's skin colour intended to stir hatred toward that group?

The person reporting the incident is defining it as racist. That doesn't make it so. You are creating another logical fallacy.

 

[noseall]

You are creating another logical fallacy.

Standard.
Gammon - not racist. MBK - wrong as per.

 

[Notch7]

What definition would you call an abusive statement based on a person's skin colour intended to stir hatred toward that group?

Gammon is not based on skin colour, a black person can be a gammon.

It’s based on a persons emotional state

Gammons are red because they are angry

 

[Notch7]

You are creating another logical fallacy.

Motorgrifting is a typical Reform supporter.