Reform immigration plan

[ellal]

Its not rocket science.

A = the total cost all in of illegals. (not just the housing costs)
B = the total income tax revenue to the government
C = the amount of income tax you paid according to your last self assessment.

(A / B) * C =

Ah, so you have access to all this 'knowledge' then?

Funnily enough no-one else seems to have a definitive answer...

And the included word 'illegals' kind of gives you the reason why

Plus a range of 2-5K?

Seems you ought to stick to rocket science and stop wasting your time scribbling pointless equations on the back of garbage's discarded fag packets

 

[noseall]

OMG!! You have found yet another way to boast about how rich you are.

Such a c**t.

 

[Odds]

That is the original Gumby, I believe.

I know of a guy from the great state of Tennessee who was completely baffled when i told him about the Monty P. Gumby. The American version is a weird cartoon character who looks like this:

 

[MNW67]

A = the total cost all in of illegals. (not just the housing costs)

How much do you believe that is. I think you might have mentioned £10+ billion before.

 

[motorbiking]

How much do you believe that is. I think you might have mentioned £10+ billion before.

There are quite a few articles that suggest its around 4-5bn on housing alone
The IFS say £6.4bn overspend on "day to day". I would suggest a figure of 7-8Bn allowing for legal services, courts, paying the French, NHS, etc is probably on the low side.
but lets go in the middle with £7.5Bn, Income tax take is £330.7Bn (25-26)

So
A = 7.5Bn
B = 330.7Bn
~2.6%

Now you could argue that they may spend the money from other income, but ultimately all taxes come from the tax payer one way or another.

 

[motorbiking]

Ah, so you have access to all this 'knowledge' then?

Funnily enough no-one else seems to have a definitive answer...

And the included word 'illegals' kind of gives you the reason why

Plus a range of 2-5K?

Seems you ought to stick to rocket science and stop wasting your time scribbling pointless equations on the back of garbage's discarded fag packets

funny that its all available with a few google queries.

 

[MNW67]

There are quite a few articles that suggest its around 4-5bn on housing alone
The IFS say £6.4bn overspend on "day to day". I would suggest a figure of 7-8Bn allowing for legal services, courts, paying the French, NHS, etc is probably on the low side.
but lets go in the middle with £7.5Bn, Income tax take is £330.7Bn (25-26)

So
A = 7.5Bn
B = 330.7Bn
~2.6%

Now you could argue that they may spend the money from other income, but ultimately all taxes come from the tax payer one way or another.

What is the purpose of looking at it as a percentage of income tax. Why not as a percentage of total tax or total spending. It sounds like a bit of a fiddled statistic.

 

[motorbiking]

What is the purpose of looking at it as a percentage of income tax. Why not as a percentage of total tax or total spending. It sounds like a bit of a fiddled statistic.

Total spending would be silly, total tax take, already answered.

 

[MNW67]

Total spending would be silly, total tax take, already answered.

Where?

 

[motorbiking]

Such a c**t.

assuming you only marginally fiddle your taxes, they are costing you £250 a year. Thats probably another week staring at a locked gate on a cheap sunbed for you.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

.

 

[motorbiking]

Where?

post 490

 

[noseall]

Such a c**t.

Still

 

[MNW67]

post 490

I found it.

Now you could argue that they may spend the money from other income, but ultimately all taxes come from the tax payer one way or another.

What point are you making. That 2.6% of income tax is spent on asylum. It sounds like one of those pointless statistics like there are more MPs in the House of Commons than baked beans in a tin of beans.

 

[pete01]

Still

Don't talk to yourself mate