- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,751
- Reaction score
- 5,326
- Country
So no idea - thought so.
One for the legal eagles - forcing the sale of a jointly owned house
- Thread starter MeldrewsMate
- Start date
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 17,840
- Reaction score
- 1,500
- Country
That's 2 of us by the sound of it, righto
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,751
- Reaction score
- 5,326
- Country
I am confident I will make a breakthrough with MNW, once we correct his understanding of consideration and the exception impact of estoppel on F v B we are there.
there is zero chance anyone can educate you. sorry about that.. sorry, not sorry,
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 17,840
- Reaction score
- 1,500
- Country
May I remind you, he isn't the 1st person that has tied you up in knots
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,751
- Reaction score
- 5,326
- Country
oh look, someone has done all the heavy lifting for me:
www.lawgazette.co.uk
Commercial considerations can influence the discharge of liabilities
In Collier v P&MJ Wright (Holdings) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1329, [2008] 1 WLR 643, [2007] All ER(D) 233 (Dec) (Collier), the Court of Appeal examined the rule in Pinnel's case (1603) 5 Coke's Rep 117a (the rule), in the context of contemporary commercial considerations.
www.lawgazette.co.uk
oh look, someone has done all the heavy lifting for me:
Commercial considerations can influence the discharge of liabilities
In Collier v P&MJ Wright (Holdings) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1329, [2008] 1 WLR 643, [2007] All ER(D) 233 (Dec) (Collier), the Court of Appeal examined the rule in Pinnel's case (1603) 5 Coke's Rep 117a (the rule), in the context of contemporary commercial considerations.
This is what you always do. You are unable to make a coherent argument yourself, so you just point at random things, in an attempt to deflect from questions you are unable to answer.
Go back to 147 and looks at the answers I gave you and proceed from there.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,751
- Reaction score
- 5,326
- Country
An article in the law gazette which discusses F v B, and the Denning doctrine of estoppel. is just some random link?
It precisely explains why Collier's Debt was set aside. He was jointly and severally liable. He paid less than the amount of the judgement 1/3rd.
Something you have made up.
From the man who had never heard of F v B or estoppel until yesterday.
Actually, I wasn't even intending to get involved today. I only came on here to add a quick explainer from yesterday. It is disrupting my other tasks so I am going to have to bow out for now.
His debt wasn't set aside. The statutory demand was. A different thing entirely. See my answer #147.
This wasn't even a full trial. They were simply trying to see if there was a "triable issue" to enable it go forward to a full hearing.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,751
- Reaction score
- 5,326
- Country
You think he paid the remaining 2/3rds. ?
- Joined
- 30 May 2022
- Messages
- 1,291
- Reaction score
- 756
- Country
When you failed him on this test, @motorbiking
did he walk away away ranting something about the school not being legitimate, or licensed and demanding that he's been riding motorbikes for decades so knows what he's doing?
Can you get Google AI assistant to pass a practical driving test yet?
Can you get Google AI assistant to pass a practical driving test yet?
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 17,840
- Reaction score
- 1,500
- Country
Or did you have to ask him what he had for breakfast before he went to the test , because it might be relevant.When you failed him on this test, @motorbiking View attachment 392167did he walk away away ranting something about the school not being legitimate, or licensed and demanding that he's been riding motorbikes for decades so knows what he's doing?
Can you get Google AI assistant to pass a practical driving test yet?
And then you and mbk can discuss whether cereals or eggs are best, and twist way from the point altogether
