To all those that welcome/encourage the small boat migrants.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Where did this story originate from?
Who first posted it?

Its here - I asked him when it happed and he ignored me for some reason. i looked in the news for it and couldn’t find it
Idf "arrested" a 4 year old boy, dragging him away screaming, accusing of being a tunneler.
Why would they do that?
 

There's a disproportionate amount of offences going on in our country, by these savages
The average violent crime rate in UK is about 32 per 1,000.
The current number of asylum seekers in UK is about 110,000
Ergo, for the number of violent crimes committed by asylum seekers to be disproportionate, the number would have to be greater than 110 * 32
= 3,520

Is it?
 
Its here - I asked him when it happed and he ignored me for some reason. i looked in the news for it and couldn’t find it
Ther clearly have been incidents concerning 4 year old boys, which I posted a while ago.
But whether any of those relate to the specific one that J_P mentioned, I don't know.

Here's one that was posted very recently in Instagram apparently trying to show IDF in a good light, and of course Hamas in a bd light.

Here is my earlier post concerning some 4 year old Palestinian boys.
There have been some notable incidents relating to IDF and 4 year old children.
The March 2025 Gaza incident seems to be the one being discussed here.

The IDF regularly arrest, shoot or kill young Palestinian boys.
 
The average violent crime rate in UK is about 32 per 1,000.
The current number of asylum seekers in UK is about 110,000
Ergo, for the number of violent crimes committed by asylum seekers to be disproportionate, the number would have to be greater than 110 * 32
= 3,520

Is it?
You dont get it do you -- people are not looking for parity on murders by asylum seekers- they dont want ANY murders by them. All the ones arriving by non regular means need to be held securely until we know who they are and will not be a threat to our citizens.
 
Last edited:
You dont get it do you --people are not looking for parity on murders by asylum seekers
Yorksbuiler clearly was. He commented on it. :rolleyes:
There's a disproportionate amount of offences going on in our country, by these savages


they dont want ANY murders by them.
Well that is a surprise, people don't want any murders?
Wow, how long did it take for you to work that out. :rolleyes:


All the ones arriving by non regular means need to be held securely until we know who they are are will not be a threat to our citizens.
Currently the cost of asylum seekers accommodation is between £2 Billion and £8 Billion per year. The lower cost being the most recent.

For secure accommodation, a sum of something like £200 Billion would need to be spent to accommodate about 1,000 asylum seekers. (there's currently about 100,000 asylum seekers in UK), so a figure of something like £20,000 Billion would be needed to create, modify or build sufficient secure accommodation.
Do you think the UK tax payer would accept that?

Then there's the legal concern.
Legal and practical limitations
Beyond the financial costs, there are legal and practical reasons why blanket secure accommodation is not a simple option for asylum seekers in the UK.
  • Legal basis for detention: UK law only allows for a person to be detained for immigration purposes when there is a "realistic prospect of removal within a reasonable period".
  • Asylum seekers vs. failed asylum seekers: People claiming asylum have a legal right to be in the UK until their case is decided, which can take months or years. Detaining them during this time is generally not considered lawful because there is no prospect of imminent removal.
  • Limited detention capacity: The UK's current immigration detention system is not designed to hold a large population for extended periods. Expanding this capacity to include all asylum seekers would require massive investment in infrastructure and staff.
  • Ethical and welfare concerns: Large-scale, secure detention has been widely criticised by charities and parliamentary committees. The conditions in facilities like the Napier barracks have been described as "quasi-detention," with poor living standards and isolated locations that negatively impact health and access to
Any more bright ideas?
:rolleyes:
 
Yorksbuiler clearly was. He commented on it. :rolleyes:




Well that is a surprise, people don't want any murders?
Wow, how long did it take for you to work that out. :rolleyes:



Currently the cost of asylum seekers accommodation is between £2 Billion and £8 Billion per year. The lower cost being the most recent.

For secure accommodation, a sum of something like £200 Billion would need to be spent to accommodate about 1,000 asylum seekers. (there's currently about 100,000 asylum seekers in UK), so a figure of something like £20,000 Billion would be needed to create, modify or build sufficient secure accommodation.
Do you think the UK tax payer would accept that?

Then there's the legal concern.

Any more bright ideas?
:rolleyes:
You are just making up numbes now.
Tents in army/MOD barracks / sites will not cost anything like that.
 
You are just making up numbes now.
Tents in army/MOD barracks / sites will not cost anything like that.
You said secure accommodation. :rolleyes:
Evidently proper secure accommodation is not secure enough. I don't think tents would quite cut it. :rolleyes:
 
The tents would be on a secure barracks/ x mod site not on the local park :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
  • Specific site plans: Some sites have specific targets.
    • Wethersfield: Plans aim for a total capacity of 1,700 asylum seekers.
    • Scampton: Plans aim for a total capacity of 2,000 asylum seekers.
    • Bexhill: Plans aim for up to 1,200 people once fully operational.

Only another 95,000 to find. :rolleyes:

Are you even slightly capable of thinking though any of your barmy ideas?

How will you get round the legal constraints? :rolleyes:
 
lol desperate for my attention. I thought for a moment you had some intelligence, alas you're already managing starmerite level verbal assaults, over my avatar flag which is basic level troll baiting,

Absolutely nothing to do with your avatar, and everything to do with this:

... the lefties etc i guess will just shrug their shoulders and carry on apoligising for being british, apologise to the next lot arriving for any delay in processing, whilst shoving the 'racist protesters' out the way branding them as extreme right wing thugs, till it happens again. ...

Although, of course, what you've shown yourself to be there does confirm what I've said about what sort of people many of the GB/UK flag-wavers turn out to be.
 
Prove it.
He'll have to find about 3.500 violent crimes by Asylum seekers.
The average violent crime rate in UK is about 32 per 1,000.
The current number of asylum seekers in UK is about 110,000
Ergo, for the number of violent crimes committed by asylum seekers to be disproportionate, the number would have to be greater than 110 * 32
= 3,520

Is it?
 
A ludicrous fantasy which people who have reached the limit of their ability to reason reach for.
Be fair, he's worried about being eaten by a tiger, in Africa. :rolleyes:
And the violinist has just given him the finger, when he thought she fancied him. :ROFLMAO:
 
Seems there are basically two sorts of people here.

There are those who hate, absolutely hate, all foreigners, who want to beat foreigners up, torture them, kill them even, and who consider that these attitudes to fellow human beings are British values of which to be proud.

And there are the civilised ones.
What a crackpot thing to say ---you are saying people on this forum want to beat foreigners up, torture them, kill them --- are you OK have you taken something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top