Labour receive another kicking at the ballot box.

[aveatry]

This is what the sneaky rat has done

Salient points.
Have they been altered ?

 

[morqthana]

How about this for slimy posting - editing a post this way is no different to altering a post --- I would report it if I thought reporting a MOD would do any good but it wont will it john
View attachment 397662

He didn't alter it.

He changed none of your words.

He added no words.

He deleted no words.

Adding formatting to highlight relevant aspects he wanted to respond to is perfectly OK, it is not "slimy".

So desperate are you to avoid scrutiny that you try a ludicrous accusation like this. What's wrong with you??

 

[morqthana]

This is what the sneaky rat has done

carmanmemoranda's post still reads

Salient points.
Have they been altered ?

in the quote.

What is it you think you altered?

 

[noseall]

I think somebody is not telling the truth.

Is is the alleged "relatives?"

Or is it aveatry?

He won't answer, rather deflect and waffle and blame your quoting or some such. Typical liar. Typical troll.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

This is what the sneaky rat has done

You missed out

Salient.

The most important bit

 

[noseall]

You missed out

Salient.

The most important bit

Yes, the bits where he lied. Now he’s dithering and deflecting. Anything rather than face the question.

Typical low level trolling.

 

[motorbiking]

Low level trolling would be the obvious personal attack and slur, that the same poster objects to when its directed at him.

I think somebody is not telling the truth.

Is is the alleged "relatives?"

Or is it aveatry?

Labour Fanboys are trying very hard to make Reform the new nasty party. All that happens is their popularity gets under represented in the polls.

meanwhile poor Kier Starmer barely has control of his cabinet, let alone the country.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Low level trolling would be the obvious personal attack and slur, that the same poster objects to when its directed at him.


Labour Fanboys are trying very hard to make Reform the new nasty party.

They are doing that themselves

All that happens is their popularity gets under represented in the polls.

I refer you to the recent happenings where they were expected to WIN

meanwhile poor Kier Starmer barely has control of his cabinet, let alone the country.

You never said much about the previous PM's, and there were quite a few in just a few months

 

[motorbiking]

You never said much about the previous PM's, and there were quite a few in just a few months

I was openly critical of Sunak.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

View attachment 397741

I was openly critical of Sunak.

Yes, just the 1.

Along with open support of others

 

[aveatry]

Here you are then - its a fun game actually

He didn't alter it.
He changed none of your words.
He added no words.
He deleted no words.
Adding formatting to highlight relevant aspects he wanted to respond to is perfectly OK, it is not "slimy".
So desperate are you to avoid scrutiny that you try a ludicrous accusation like this. What's wrong with you??

What is it to you unless you are JohnD
Any normal person would see what he has done and agree its slimy

 

[noseall]

View attachment 397741

I was openly critical of Sunak.

And yet you gleefully smoked Boris’s horn.

Go figure.

 

[motorbiking]

And yet you gleefully smoked Boris’s horn.

You apparently don't even vote.

Go figure.

 

[morqthana]

Here you are then - its a fun game actually

What is it to you unless you are JohnD
Any normal person would see what he has done and agree its slimy

My post which you quoted still reads

He didn't alter it.

He changed none of your words.

He added no words.

He deleted no words.

Adding formatting to highlight relevant aspects he wanted to respond to is perfectly OK, it is not "slimy".

So desperate are you to avoid scrutiny that you try a ludicrous accusation like this. What's wrong with you??

What do you think you altered?

Are you visually impaired in some way?

 

[aveatry]

My post which you quoted still reads

He didn't alter it.

He changed none of your words.

He added no words.

He deleted no words.

Adding formatting to highlight relevant aspects he wanted to respond to is perfectly OK, it is not "slimy".

So desperate are you to avoid scrutiny that you try a ludicrous accusation like this. What's wrong with you??

What do you think you altered?

Are you visually impaired in some way?

Of course John - you are going to defend yourself