Shows how untrustworthy the BBC are

[blup]

Deleted

There’s no need to cancel yourself

 

[motorbiking]

It’s actually very resilient, huge viewing figures for drama, factual and reality type programmes plus radio 3 and 4 for the inquisitive, People can and do separate off it’s different elements, like the news output

and more and more households opting out of the fee. BBC trust arrogantly call this the evasion rate.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Maybe give your glasses a wipe, you appear to have oil on them.

"this gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action."

It cannot be clearer than that.

Taken out of overall context.

Get out the puddle you're driwning

 

[blup]

and more and more households opting out of the fee. BBC trust arrogantly call this the evasion rate.

I imagine there’s good evidence for that. Any large organisation- public or private sector - is like an oil tanker, it takes a long time to change course, even after the command is given. I had a run in with a major internet provider during lock down, luckily I had proof of posting, but their debt department still didn’t get the message for six months, even though the complaints department had already compensated me.

 

[motorbiking]

Taken out of overall context.

Get out the puddle you're driwning

The overall context was that it "gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action."

 

[motorbiking]

I imagine there’s good evidence for that. Any large organisation- public or private sector - is like an oil tanker, it takes a long time to change course, even after the command is given. I had a run in with a major internet provider during lock down, luckily I had proof of posting, but their debt department still didn’t get the message for six months, even though the complaints department had already compensated me.

I think they need to be split in to a core service and a subscription service. I am quite happy not to consume the licensable content. I miss Dragons Den and I'd miss radio 4 if I needed a licence for it. But I don't my LBC/news radio as an alternative and have plenty of pod casts for long drives.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

The overall context was that it "gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action."

No.

The news of the actual event didn't.

The panorama program did.

Simple and clear differences. For this world class lawyer you do struggle with the differences

Good job you're not a beeb lawyer, you would cost us all a fortune

 

[motorbiking]

No.

The news of the actual event didn't.

The panorama program did.

Simple and clear differences. For this world class lawyer you do struggle with the differences

Good job you're not a beeb lawyer, you would cost us all a fortune

nonsense - its literally what they said. The words are clear. No amount of waffle, deflection, anger or nonsense from you changes what was no doubt a very carefully scrutinised apology, which the beebs lawyers would have been all over.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

nonsense - its literally what they said. The words are clear. No amount of waffle, deflection, anger or nonsense from you changes what was no doubt a very carefully scrutinised apology, which the beebs lawyers would have been all over.

Yes, that's why the beeb agreed to pay him, not.

You can't stand back far enough to see the full picture. Your hatred of the beeb is clouding your judgement

 

[motorbiking]

Yes, that's why the beeb agreed to pay him, not.

You can't stand back far enough to see the full picture. Your hatred of the beeb is clouding your judgement

no old bean, your hatred of Trump is clouding your judgement over a very bad thing that the BBC did.

I don't care if it's Trump, Putin, Rayner, Starmer, Tommy ten names or the Pope. This fell below the standard expected by a broadcaster who prides itself on impartiality.

They got it wrong and they admitted it. They need to focus on rebuilding their reputation and attracting more subscribers.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

no old bean, your hatred of Trump is clouding your judgement over a very bad thing that the BBC did.

I don't care if it's Trump, Putin, Rayner, Starmer, Tommy ten names or the Pope. This fell below the standard expected by a broadcaster who prides itself on impartiality.

They got it wrong and they admitted it. They need to focus on rebuilding their reputation and attracting more subscribers.

But you constantly conflate 2 different issues.

The beeb got the panorama edit wrong, and have apologised.

They didn't get the news wrong at the time, as evidenced by worldwide news outlets.

It's your judgement that's clouded. Not mine, nor the Beebs lawyers.

But you keep on trying to prove the differences are the same. And failing.

As I said before, the real lawyers don't seem too concerned. Mainly because of the facts that existed way before panorama

 

[motorbiking]

But you constantly conflate 2 different issues.

The beeb got the panorama edit wrong, and have apologised.

They didn't get the news wrong at the time, as evidenced by worldwide news outlets.

It's your judgement that's clouded. Not mine, nor the Beebs lawyers.

But you keep on trying to prove the differences are the same. And failing.

As I said before, the real lawyers don't seem too concerned. Mainly because of the facts that existed way before panorama

Are you saying they were wrong to say that their edit "gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action."?

 

[morqthana]

Diddums.

the expected reaction.
nothing new to see here.

Its because people are sick of the lefty woke trolls on here...

right back atcha furface.

Bit of hypocrisy there...

 

[Koolpc]

Why not ?

As far as I can see the resignation that hasn't happened is from the Panorama team. Which I know was overall headed by the 2 that resigned, but not as direct manager

Because its not enough. How does someone resigning help restore the lies/libel against Trump?

 

[morqthana]

Splitting hairs, yes?

No, not really. However much of a farce the trial was, it isn't splitting hairs to recognise the difference between being put on trial for an alleged offence and being found not guilty.