The court of appeal isn't interested but the criminal case review commission ought to be. The last boss appears to have ben forced out for not being proactive on a similar miscarriage of justice case, so will be interesting to see how the new one handles this.
Lucy Letby case - Evidence discussion thread
- Thread starter IT Minion
- Start date
Squeaky bum time at the hospital https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g94jzgl4eo
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 15,074
- Reaction score
- 8,935
- Country
It was the paper that Dr Shoo Lee had written that was used as evidence. He was furious that he was not consulted over it as been used as evidence of this case. He said that the paper had been mis interpretted and was out of date. He had written a new report that superceded that particular paper. The prosecutions medical expert who had used this paper to present the evidence to the jury was not qualified to do so.
Interesting article in the DM suggesting that evidence given at the trial by a doctor that LL was caught red handed is inconsistent with an earlier pre police investigation statement given by the same medic.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Somewhat of a carrot and stick approach by tne appeal team, but as the sub postmasters found out, media involvement is crucial.
Bombshell email that could free Lucy Letby
SPECIAL REPORT: The memo, revealed yesterday, is a significant boost to the nurse's legal fight to overturn her convictions.
Somewhat of a carrot and stick approach by tne appeal team, but as the sub postmasters found out, media involvement is crucial.
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 15,074
- Reaction score
- 8,935
- Country
No more additional charges or no charges full stop?
Her original convictions have to be looked at again...
Too many prominent experts have put their heads above the parapet to say this must happen...
But the state institutions will resist it because they 'cannot be proved wrong'!
I’m guessing full stop but you can never say never. The expert evidence at her first trial has been called into question, so relying again on statistical connection with no direct evidence against anyone would be challenged much more forcefully. The last thing the CPS needs is to lose.
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,554
- Reaction score
- 5,691
- Country
They are saying no more charges. Not that her current convictions are quashed.
“The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said it had reviewed evidence into further allegations of murder and attempted murder against nine children at the Countess of Chester Hospital and Liverpool Women's Hospital but "the evidential test was not met in any of those cases".
Could it be they were worried about her being acquitted putting pressure on current convictions?
“The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said it had reviewed evidence into further allegations of murder and attempted murder against nine children at the Countess of Chester Hospital and Liverpool Women's Hospital but "the evidential test was not met in any of those cases".
Could it be they were worried about her being acquitted putting pressure on current convictions?
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 15,074
- Reaction score
- 8,935
- Country
I think if she has been charged with the previous "murders" what makes these further nine so different?
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 15,074
- Reaction score
- 8,935
- Country
That may actually be the case, the leading experts all disagreed that there were any murders at all. What an awful thing to happen to her on the word of a few average Drs trying to cover up their mistakes.
I watched a documentary on it, it makes a good case for her being innocent
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 15,074
- Reaction score
- 8,935
- Country
It is terrible, they cannot say that she is guilty. They should release her on account of the world leading experts saying she is innocent.
