London one of safest cities in the world

Well there’s only one way to get anywhere near that without either (a) stopping them from entering in the first place or (b) for those that do get Ubered into the country, holding them somewhere secure until they are either judged to be no risk and given asylum or deported. Unless you know of another way?
All good ideas Mottie, but all cost shed loads of money. The same reason the impoverished lot are risking the Channel to get here in the first place.

It's a pity there isn't a refugee island where all war torn or persecuted individuals could not seek sanctuary from their oppressors. All the globes' nations could chip in. We could call it Essex. :cool:
 
Last edited:
All good ideas Mottie, but all cost shed loads of money. The same reason the impoverished lot are risking the Channel to get here in the first place.

It's a pity there isn't a refugee island where all war torn or persecuted individuals could not seek sanctuary for their oppressors. All the globes' nations could chip in. We could call it Essex. :cool:
Canvey. Put 'em all on Canvey! Or Sheppy.
 
It's a pity there isn't a refugee island where all war torn or persecuted individuals could not seek sanctuary for their oppressors. All the globes' nations could chip in.
Staffordshire would be much cheaper, house prices are cheaper than chips, and it would give them a taste of grim northern life. Alternatively Greenland. World's largest Island? with less than 50,000 inhabitants.
 
I'd say none, but that is neither realistic nor is it achievable, given the fact that the UK would suffer much more calamitous effects, if we were to pull up the drawbridge and cease all immigration and boot out all immigrants tomorrow.

This is the most dishonest bs ever, Nosey. Trying to make out that those who oppose letting in ever increasing numbers of the third world's peasant detritus means that they are also against limited, managed immigration of those who will be a benefit to The UK.

What would be so wrong in returning to the immigration policies before Bliar and the crooks that came after him?

Anyone who supports taxpayer funded mass immigration of millions of the world's flotsam either has no kids (JohnD) or hates the kids they have.

Cheap trick, keep trying! :rolleyes:
 
This is the most dishonest bs ever, Nosey. Trying to make out that those who oppose letting in ever increasing numbers of the third world's peasant detritus means that they are also against limited, managed immigration of those who will be a benefit to The UK.

Cheap trick, keep trying! :rolleyes:
Europeans?

Brexers put a stop to that.

 
What religion is Sunak?
don't think it was a big thing with him, but I believe he was hindu, and they're good guys, Hinduism is a good religion full of nice kind people. that is why Indian people are great to have about, hard working, peaceful, kind, like animals.
 
All good ideas Mottie, but all cost shed loads of money. The same reason the impoverished lot are risking the Channel to get here in the first place.

It's a pity there isn't a refugee island where all war torn or persecuted individuals could not seek sanctuary from their oppressors. All the globes' nations could chip in. We could call it Essex. :cool:
Refugees and immigrants traditionally clustered in parts of East London. When they could afford it, thanks to social mobility, their descendants often moved away.
 
Refugees and immigrants traditionally clustered in parts of East London. When they could afford it, thanks to social mobility, their descendants often moved away.
You can guarantee the angry old white gammons in the area will (re) form a lynch mob.
 
Back
Top