High Court Rules...

noseall · 2026-02-15T09:32:34+0000

ellal said:
Did the court convict them of any criminal offence?

Nope.

MNW67 · 2026-02-15T09:33:21+0000

motorbiking said:
Nobody was on trial

Perhaps Yvette Cooper was!

But seriously, I have been trying to find the government policy which she is supposed to have not followed correctly. It looks like Cooper was correct to determine that PA is a terrorist organisation. But then she was supposed to follow five tests to determine whether it was proportionate to proscribe them. Do you know what/where that policy is?

MNW67 · 2026-02-15T09:35:43+0000

ellal said:
But the six Palestine Action people who were acquitted were not criminals!

It appears you are confusing the issue

It is true that they weren't convicted. But we don't know why the jury made that decision. It might be that the whole jury decided that they were criminals, but also decided on conscientious grounds not to convict them.

motorbiking · 2026-02-15T09:41:35+0000

MNW67 said:
It is true that they weren't convicted. But we don't know why the jury made that decision. It might be that the whole jury decided that they were criminals, but also decided on conscientious grounds not to convict them.

Or that the elements of GBH with intent were not quite met and lower offence was more appropriate

motorbiking · 2026-02-15T09:43:02+0000

MNW67 said:
Perhaps Yvette Cooper was!

But seriously, I have been trying to find the government policy which she is supposed to have not followed correctly. It looks like Cooper was correct to determine that PA is a terrorist organisation. But then she was supposed to follow five tests to determine whether it was proportionate to proscribe them. Do you know what/where that policy is?

I’m on my mobile. You might find it in the act itself or maybe this is it

Proscribed terrorist groups or organisations

www.gov.uk

noseall · 2026-02-15T09:44:15+0000

motorbiking said:
Criminals

Individually name them and their crimes.

motorbiking · 2026-02-15T09:45:44+0000

noseall said:
Individually name them and their crimes.

Google it

noseall · 2026-02-15T09:49:18+0000

motorbiking said:
Google it

There are no criminals. I could not find them. Perhaps you have some names?

motorbiking · 2026-02-15T10:12:43+0000

You couldn’t even find their wiki page.

motorbiking · 2026-02-15T10:58:27+0000

ellal said:
But the six Palestine Action people who were acquitted were not criminals!

It appears you are confusing the issue

the Jury could not reach verdicts for charges of criminal damage against all six defendants, or on the allegation that Mr Corner, 23, inflicted grievous bodily harm on Police Sergeant Kate Evans.
Nor could they reach a verdict on the charges of violent disorder against Ms Head, Mr Corner, and Ms Kamio.

glad I could help

noseall · 2026-02-15T11:03:09+0000

motorbiking said:
Criminals

List them.

List their crimes.

List their convictions.

I'll wait....

motorbiking · 2026-02-15T11:09:27+0000

write your own essay, there have been dozens of convictions and dozens of charges.

do you think the court was wrong when it said:

The court concludes that Palestine Action is an organisation that promotes its political cause through criminality and the encouragement of criminality

noseall · 2026-02-15T11:11:10+0000

motorbiking said:
waffle

noseall said:
List them.

List their crimes.

List their convictions.

Criminals you said.

...the wait goes on.

King Billy · 2026-02-15T11:15:27+0000

Dec27 said:
Another Jew bashing thread from odds.

Where?

motorbiking · 2026-02-15T11:15:54+0000

noseall said:
Criminals you said.

Yep and the high court agrees. What else would you call people who promote criminality and the encouragement of criminality

High Court Rules...

Similar threads