"Zionist War Criminal"

You are not adult enough for this conversation. See Ya.. You are not joining in you are trolling it.
You could put me on ignore, please, please.

I wouldn't want you banned from a thread, I'm content to see you get all tied up with your own silly comments.
But when you retreat into your childish troll mode, I'll stop responding, pigeon.
 
You could put me on ignore, please, please.

I wouldn't want you banned from a thread, I'm content to see you get all tied up with your own silly comments.
But when you retreat into your childish troll mode, I'll stop responding, pigeon.
I will not respond further to you as you are not here for debate.
 
Depends where the trial is held and the make up of the jury.
If the Damage is under £5k it is summary only. The CPS can hold back the more serious charges to see how this one goes. If the magistrate is inclined to convict, the CPS will ask the aggravating factors to be taken into account. Nice low profile conviction, with amore to come either way.

JohnD and Himmy have been premature, with their excitement.
 
An example of a premature post:

Interesting that the man was arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated criminal damage.

Obviously the police can see through the use of Zionist as a proxy word.

Poor Chicken Biker got overly excited.
 
The legal position hasn't changed.

You can't be found guilty of racially aggravated criminal damage simply for calling Churchill a Zionist. He was proud of being a Zionist.

But it is not clear what else this man wrote. If some of those things were bad enough, then he might be found guilty.
 
The legal position hasn't changed.

You can't be found guilty of racially aggravated criminal damage simply for calling Churchill a Zionist. He was proud of being a Zionist.

But it is not clear what else this man wrote. If some of those things were bad enough, then he might be found guilty.
Its fairly clear
 
Back
Top