Certainly a person who does not seek to help children who are not responsible for the poverty they live in,
Perhaps festive is such a person.
'Perhaps' i am one that gives wholly to people who are responsible, and not to people who have way more children than they can afford. We all know apart from the fools, that the stupid idealistic strapline of 'lifting children out of poverty' is a dreamland bullshit starry eye'd starmer line, made for fools like you.
Lets be real:
Cash benefits do not translate to better child outcomes
Some families consistently make poor financial choices
It does not solve deeper social problems like poor parenting or low skills.
Some money will inevitably be misused(nails iphones TV Sky upgrades etc etc,
all unaccounted for because none of the recipients are audited unlike us from which the money is taken). - I really find this absurd, can anyone explain this? The money is taken through carefully audited accounts, we are hissed at for using cash in any way, yet, the main output 'the hand that giveth' is all via cash!! You could'nt make it up.
You and i don't want
any british children experiencing poverty lifestyle.
I am sure we agree on that, but i wholly disagree with throwing our hard earnt 'audited to the penny' taxed money thrown at an irresponsible parent who already has debts, overspend, too many children, and any other associated 'distractions' that means the cash with no audit trail we throw at them, makes no difference to the child, who never directly receives this 'poverty miracle helping hand'.
Am i clear now?
Now stop being such a knob jockey.