things Trump would rather talk about than Jeffrey Epstein

King Billy said:
Noseall made no mention of condoning lying.
Your question is based on the assumption that he did. It's a false assumption.
Neither did he express an opinion of what Hilary or Bill Clinton said, under oath.
Click to expand...
It was a question.
 
Dec27 said:
It was a question.
Click to expand...
Allow me to draw an analogy:
I say something like, "Thames water made massive profits last year
Scottish Water also made some profit.
Essex water provide drinking water."

And you respond with something like, "So you condone Thames water dumping untreated sewage into rivers?"
How is your question remotely relevant or connected to my statement.
It isn't in any way connected to what I said. It can only be a question based on your assumption of something that has not been said.
Therefore your 'question' is not a question, it's an implied accusation. An accusation based on your assumption of the other person's absence of a comment. Which is nonsensical.
Therfore it's an ad hominem attack, disguised by your claim that it's a question. But an ad hominem attack none the less.
 
noseall said:
He's just a lowly troll. Not worth the bandwidth.
Click to expand...
That’s a bit rich, considering you’ve lied about me! But don’t have the guts to reply to me.

You really hate it when you lose an argument.

But it’s ok flower; we all know how tough you are in the GD…

Take a few more cheap shots while you ignore me. But I won’t forget the lies….
 
King Billy said:
Allow me to draw an analogy:
I say something like, "Thames water made massive profits last year
Scottish Water also made some profit.
Essex water provide drinking water."

And you respond with something like, "So you condone Thames water dumping untreated sewage into rivers?"
How is your question remotely relevant or connected to my statement.
It isn't in any way connected to what I said. It can only be a question based on your assumption of something that has not been said.
Therefore your 'question' is not a question, it's an implied accusation. An accusation based on your assumption of the other person's absence of a comment. Which is nonsensical.
Therfore it's an ad hominem attack, disguised by your claim that it's a question. But an ad hominem attack none the less.
Click to expand...
In your opinion. I asked @noseal another question he’s to scared to reply to.

What do I have to do to get an apology? Text, email him ?
 
Dec27 said:
In your opinion. I asked @noseal another question he’s to scared to reply to.
Click to expand...
You asking for my opinion, on what?

Dec27 said:
What do I have to do to get an apology? Text, email him ?
Click to expand...
No apology deserved.

King Billy said:
Therefore your 'question' is not a question, it's an implied accusation. An accusation based on your assumption of the other person's absence of a comment. Which is nonsensical.
Therefore it's an ad hominem attack, disguised by your claim that it's a question. But an ad hominem attack none the less.
Click to expand...
How obvious do I need to make it, that your question was not a question. It was an ad hominem attack disguised as a question.
If I ask you, "are you still beating your wife?", is it a question, or an implied accusation?
 
Last edited:
Way I see it

These allegations that are said to be in the redacted Epstein files are. Imo that serious
I assume there is smoking gun evidence ???
How come he has not been charged with a criminal offence ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Anyone noticed anything missing?
Replies
11
Views
1K
denso13
denso13
JohnD
A dangerous cult now runs Britain
7 8 9
Replies
132
Views
13K
Scarlet Pimpernel
Scarlet Pimpernel
gasbanni
Social workers ..... they know best
Replies
0
Views
2K
gasbanni
gasbanni
J
Those were the good old days
2 3
Replies
34
Views
5K
EddieM
E
ChrisZx
Why is my DHW lower than stated?
2 3
Replies
41
Views
4K
ChrisZx
ChrisZx
Back
Top