Ginger men who now identifies as a woman.

[King Billy]

Hands up, who's reading King Billy's posts?

I'm flattered. I can't express my enormous gratitude to you both. You really don't know how much that means to me.
Keep up the good work.

 

[Highway Man]

I'm flattered. I can't express my enormous gratitude to you both. You really don't know how much that means to me.
Keep up the good work.

To be fair, pete cannot read more than 4 or 5 words before he becomes confused and disorientated wth what is being said.

 

[pete01]

To be fair, pete cannot read more than 4 or 5 words before he becomes confused and disorientated wth what is being said.

Sorry I couldn't read all that

wise up(TM)

 

[Highway Man]

Sorry I couldn't read all that

wise up(TM)

I know [TM]

 

[King Billy]

Thanks for the bump.
Keep up the good work.

 

[JohnD]

You complain about being called a TERF,

Wrong.

I complain about your abusive use of a word designed to attack people who believe that a man pretending to be a woman is still a man.

Which he is.

 

[King Billy]

You complain about being called a TERF, as does J K Rowling.

Wrong.

Here you are complaining about being described as a TERF.

I complain about your abusive use of a word designed to attack people who believe that a man pretending to be a woman is still a man.

It's a word that describes a person who believes that sex is immutable.
It's only the people who are described by it that considers it offensive,

If it bothers you, stop behaving like a TERF, and you won't be described as aTERF.

You'll happily describe me as being crazy, off my head, etc You'll frequently describe spineless as a racist, which he is.
But you object to being described as a TERF.
You refuse to accept that transgender people or intersex babies or people exist.
You place women's rights above the rights of Transgenders.
So you are a TERF.

Why are you so offended by being described as a TERF, if you are one.
You refuse to describe a transwomen as a women, but you don't want to be described by the correct description that suits your belief and ideology.

Evidently you are devoid of a scrap of empathy for anyone you offend, and you complain about being accurately described as a TERF.
What do you think gives you the right to be offensive without being accurately described as a TERF?

 

[Ivor Windybottom]

From the dictionary of actual words, rather than made-up rubbish that someone invented 10 minutes ago...

Turf:

 

[JohnD]

Here you are complaining about being described as a TERF.

Wrong.

JohnD said:
"I complain about your abusive use of a word designed to attack people who believe that a man pretending to be a woman is still a man.

Which he is."

 

[JohnD]

You refuse to describe a transwomen as a women

Wrong.

I refuse to describe a man as a woman.

Because he isn't one.

You find that difficult to comprehend.

Thank you for keeping your bigoted and reality-denying beliefs in the public eye.

 

[King Billy]

Wrong.

JohnD said:
"I complain about your abusive use of a word designed to attack people who believe that a man pretending to be a woman is still a man.

Which he is."

You're going round in circles.
You refuse to acknowledge the existence of Transgenders or intersex people.
You intentionlly conflate transwomen with male sex criminals

You want to put women's rights above other groups rights.
Therefore you are a Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist. But you don't like being described as such.

if it walks and talks like a duck, it's probably a duck.

Here you are acting and talking like a TERF, yet you object to being described as a TERF, because it offends you.
yet you're more than willing to offend others.
You offensively conflate transwomen with male sex criminals. You offensively accuse some of being racist. You offesnsively accuse others of being crazy or off their head.

So you think it's fine for you to be offensive, but no-one is allowed to be accurately offensive to you.

That's typical of your fanatical Radical Feminist belief, your willingness and desire to be offensive transcends anyone else's desire.

And yet you're incapable of understanding the hypocrisy.

 

[King Billy]

Wrong.

I refuse to describe a man as a woman.

Because he isn't one.

You find that difficult to comprehend.

Thank you for keeping your bigoted and reality-denying beliefs in the public eye.

I've frequently mentioned your inability to accept that intersex and transgender people exist.
You persistently conflate them with male sex criminals, as your flimsy reason for excluding transwomen from women only spaces.
All of your arguments have been phrased to conflate transgender women with male sex criminals because you have no data to support your imagined argument for excluding transgender people.
Transwomen are not sex criminals.

Perhaps you could tell us how many male sex criminals or transgenders have committed sex crimes in women's toilets, showers or changing rooms?

Let me fill in some blanks for you, just so you are better informed:

The vast majority of sex crimes are committed in mixed changing areas:

Police have raised "substantive concerns" about the potential of voyeurism taking place in the mixed changing rooms of a proposed swimming pool.
A crime prevention officer voiced concerns over plans to keep mixed changing rooms as the current facility has been the subject of voyeurism reports.

Voyeurism concerns at Stevenage pool's mixed changing rooms

A police officer suggests plans to retain mixed facilities at a leisure centre be reconsidered.

www.bbc.co.uk

This report is based on a fear of the possibility, not actual recorded data.

Another data gathering exercise, by a Women's Rights Group, over a 12 month period recorded 100% of sex crimes being committed in mixed changing rooms.:

One city, Wolverhampton, reported no sexual incidents at its single-sex facilities, compared to 11 incidents at a facility with mixed-sex changing.

Unisex changing rooms put women in danger | Fair Play For Women

There is unequivocal evidence that unisex changing rooms are more dangerous for women and girls than single-sex facilities. Get the facts

fairplayforwomen.com

Other data gathering exercises by other Women's Rights Groups reveal the same pattern, that the vast majority, in the one case 100%, of sex assault occurrs in mixed sex spaces, not in single sex spaces.
Unfortunately, in all of these data gathering exercises, invariably by women's rights groups, the data about the offences or the offenders, or the victims is rather uninformative.
Usually the specific offence is not labelled, the sex and/or gender of neither the offender nor the victim is recorded.


Now it's your opportunity to demonstrate your argument that transgenders should be conflated with sex criminals by providing some data to prove your fanatical belief and justify that transwomen should be excluded from women only spaces. (NB the use of "excluded", which coincides with your TERF belief.)

 

[King Billy]

I watched a couple of episodes of "Curfew" yesterday.
It's a dystopian TV series on Channel 5, based in UK, about all males over 9 years old being restricted to being allowed out of their homes only between 07:00am and 19:00 pm.
They are forced to wear ankle tags at all times to monitor their movements day and night in an attempt to reduce or prevent violence against women.
While everyone would support an attempt to prevent or reduce violence against women, it's very obvious that such a policy throws the baby out with the bath water.
We know that the vast majority of crimes against women are by their partners, boyfriends or husbands.
So while the policy of curfew for all males over 9 years old would reduce the violence against women, it wouldn't stop it, not by a long shot, because the male husbands and partners could still commit violence against their partners. NB. boyfriends are not exempt from the curfew, and females are not allowed into the homes of their boyfriends during curfew hours. A special licence is needed for couples to cohabit, which invariably needs an assessment of the males 'anger management'.

I saw some of these policies as a mirror of the Radical Feminist (RF) desire to exclude transgenders (TE) from women's single sex toilets and changing rooms.
a) the vast majority of violence against women is committed by close relatives, husbands, partners or boyfriends.
b) the vast majority (even 100% of) sex crimes against women occur in mixed toilets and changing rooms, not in single sex areas.
c) the police have no data to support the idea that sex crimes occur in single sex women's toilets or changing rooms. Even data gathering exercises by women's group fails to find evidence to support the TERF's policy of preventing transwomen from using female spaces.
d) I have requested any data to support such policy, but as yet nothing has appeared.

It (the transgender exclusion from single sex spaces) looks increasingly like a case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, except in this case there appears to have been no baby in the bathwater.
So the policy and arguments posited by the TERFs have been nothing to do with preventing crimes against women. That's been a smokescreen in their quest to exclude transwomen from female spaces, not because they might commit crimes, but because of the TERF's belief that sex is immutable. They refuse to recognise them as women. They refuse to recognise that intersex happens.
JohnD demonstrates this exactly with his persistent "a man cannot become a woman" type slogans.
Their dogmatic belief overrides and negates their respect for biology and medical science.

 

[pete01]

Less is more(TM)

 

[Ivor Windybottom]

More is much less. Zero in fact, as nobody reads it.