Ginger men who now identifies as a woman.

[King Billy]

I think he's locked in his cell now, he must be let out at night....

Prison is my guess

Remember this?

going off topic then you know and should expect the consequences of your irrational behavior.

Stick to the topic please.

stick to the topic,

in this topic.

Hypocritical is an understatement.

 

[JohnD]

Woman is a word for sex or gender.

I see you don't know what a woman is.

Turning to legal definitions, a man pretending to be a woman is not entitled to demand access to spaces and events reserved exclusively for women.

For example, toilets and changing rooms.

That fact is very difficult for you to accept.

I suppose the fact that you don't know what a woman is makes it harder for you.

 

[King Billy]

I see you don't know what a woman is.
I suppose the fact that you don't know what a woman is makes it harder for you.

Typical ad hominem and strawman tactics.
You have only those tools in your toolbox because you can't provide a rational or scientific explanation for your fanatical belief.
Nor can you provide any data to support you irrational fear of a ciswoman being abused in a toilet or changing room by a transwoman.
Let me remind that the only monitoring that has been done was by women's groups, and the data found that all people (not just ciswomen) are more likely to be abused in mixed areas than in single sex areas.
But no data exists for whether the culprit, nor the victim, was a cis-person or transgender.

Turning to legal definitions, a man pretending to be a woman is not entitled to demand access to spaces and events reserved exclusively for women.
For example, toilets and changing rooms.

How are you going to prevent trans people using the toilets or changing rooms of their choice?
The Supreme Court judgement is unenforceable, as well as being biological nonsense and scientifically illiterate.

So wallow in your TERF fanaticism in the knowledge that your belief is irrational and unscientific, and the court judgement unenforceable.

 

[Highway Man]

Remember this?





Hypocritical is an understatement.

Stick to the topic please. You are going off track.

 

[Highway Man]

Typical ad hominem and strawman tactics.
You have only those tools in your toolbox because you can't provide a rational or scientific explanation for your fanatical belief.
Nor can you provide any data to support you irrational fear of a ciswoman being abused in a toilet or changing room by a transwoman.
Let me remind that the only monitoring that has been done was by women's groups, and the data found that all people (not just ciswomen) are more likely to be abused in mixed areas than in single sex areas.
But no data exists for whether the culprit, nor the victim, was a cis-person or transgender.


How are you going to prevent trans people using the toilets or changing rooms of their choice?
The Supreme Court judgement is unenforceable, as well as being biological nonsense and scientifically illiterate.

So wallow in your TERF fanaticism in the knowledge that your belief is irrational and unscientific, and the court judgement unenforceable.

So your whole point of this droning on is that you agree that it is illegal for men who think they are women simply by donning a frock and entering women only spaces. Your whole argument is how is it to be enforced. Billy the fruitcake.

 

[King Billy]

So your whole point of this droning on is that you agree that it is illegal for men who think they are women simply by donning a frock and entering women only spaces. Your whole argument is how is it to be enforced. Billy the fruitcake.

Isn't it time for you to report to your carers?

Why would I waste my time discussing with anyone who runs crying to the mods when they're faced with a question they can't answer?

 

[Highway Man]

Isn't it time for you to report to your carers?

Why would I waste my time discussing with anyone who runs crying to the mods when they're faced with a question they can't answer?

Reported.

 

[JohnD]

Typical ad hominem and strawman tactics.

I'm glad to see you admit it.

 

[King Billy]

I'm glad to see you admit it.

Judging by your pathetic debating skills, I'm not surprised you rely on fanaticism for your raison d'etre.

 

[JohnD]

Judging by your pathetic debating skills, I'm not surprised you rely on fanaticism for your raison d'etre.

As expected

Typical ad hominem and strawman tactics.

 

[pete01]

Oldie but a goodie

 

[King Billy]

Oldie but a goodie

View attachment 413201

Yes, that's where all the sex abuse of women occurs, in the mixed areas. None recorded in single sex areas.

Yet JohnD relies on his fanatical belief, contrary to all biological knowledge and medical science, with zero evidence presented of transwomen committing offences in single-sex spaces.
That's what TERFs do. They refuse to recognise the existence of intersex or transgenders, so that they can improve the equality for women, by raising their status above what they claim are non-existent entities.
So even their fanatical belief is predicated on circular arguments.

 

[JohnD]

Poor old Billy resorts to inventing his own fantasies

Because he can't face up to the fact that a man who pretends to be a woman is not entitled to demand access to spaces and events reserved exclusively for women.

Because he isn't one.

 

[King Billy]

Because he can't face up to the fact that a man who pretends to be a woman is not entitled to demand access to spaces and events reserved exclusively for women.

How are you going to stop them?

We know why you want to stop them, it's to make women's rights higher than another group's rights. But you refuse to recognise that the other group exists. So you're trying to improve women's rights over an imaginary group. Unless you accept that that group exists.
So your argument is self defeating.
You also want to stop something which doesn't currently happen, sex abuse of ciswomen by transwomen in single sex areas.
But you refuse to accept that transwomen exist, so how can ciswomen be sexually abused by those that, in your mind, don't exist.

So your complete belief and argument is based on either something that you don't believe exists, i.e. transwomen, or genuinely doesn't exist, i.e. sexual abuse of ciswomen in single sex spaces.

I'd say that your TERFism belief is based on an irrational fear of nothing, or an irrational fear of something you don't believe exists.

And the nearest you can get to a discussion is childish ad hominem arguments, strawman arguments and meaningless slogans.

 

[JohnD]

We know why you want to stop them,

Obviously you don't.

And the nearest you can get to a discussion is childish ad hominem arguments, strawman arguments and meaningless slogans.