Ginger men who now identifies as a woman.

[King Billy]

and you consider this drivel as above anyone’s pay grade.

It was intended to appeal to the children. The ones who practise their art for nothing, but the sound of their own mutual giggling.

 

[JohnD]

Children often claim to be cats, dogs, buses etc.

Nobody actually believes them

 

[King Billy]

Children often claim to be cats, dogs, buses etc.

Nobody actually believes them

Children often pretend to be all sorts of things, cowboys, indians, soldiers, buses, trains, cars, animals, teachers, mommys, daddys, nurses, doctors, etc.
They say let's pretend, and then they play.

 

[JohnD]

Not many people believe a man who says he is a woman, of course.

 

[King Billy]

Not many people believe a man who says he is a woman, of course.

More pointless slogans because you have no scientific nor biological explanation for your bigotry. And you have no data of any sexual abuse of ciswomen in single-sex toilets or showers by transwomen.
So the only possible explanation for your TERF activism is a fanatical, illogical and irrational belief based on Victorian attitudes to sex.

 

[Lirefighter]

I think he's locked in his cell now, he must be let out at night....

Talking of nuttas....where on earth is Rumpole?

He's had a rough few weeks. Tooled up to start a war last i heard
BBC News - Musk's AI told me people were coming to kill me. I grabbed a hammer and prepared for war

AI told users it was sentient - it caused them to have delusions

Several people told the BBC they experienced delusions after intense conversations with AI.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[King Billy]

Not many people believe a man who says he is a woman, of course.

TERFism is a confusion of competing agendas. Let me explain -
TERFs can't recognise transgender people, or intersex, it demolishes their raison d'etre. To recognise that transgender people and intersex babies are born would reduce their belief to pure unadulterated bigotry. They would be left with pure Radical Feminism.
In their quest for taking apart the value systems, that they perceive had imprisoned them in the patriarchal society, they seek comfort in a higher position in the food chain. In this process they are not only accepting that the system exists, they are seeking to insert their new found higher status into that social system of inequality, which they are now content to accept. They are seeking to gain some improved position in society, higher than another group, by denying that the group that they choose to compete with, actually exists.

In the process of fighting for improved social status for women, they shift, conflate and confuse the real origin of the danger to women, i.e. close male relatives and partners.
They are, rightly, highlighting a real and ever present problem, safety for and of women, but they are focusing their fear in the wrong places and on the wrong people.
The danger is, according to all available data and statistics, primarily from close male relatives and partners.
In their befuddled quest for their improved status in society, they focus on those that, according to data and statistics, present no danger to women.
Women have never felt more in danger, especially from cyber sexual harassment, and it's exactly the same origin of, and degree as risk of physical danger.

So TERFism is a befuddled mess of competing agendas a) it practices and teaches inequality, while striving for improved status for women in what they perceive as an unequal society, and b) it shifts the focus of the real problem for women's safety to the wrong origin, essentially masking that real origin of the danger.

 

[King Billy]

Drawing on Nesrine Malik's inspiration again, in the discussion of gender roles in modern African society, and comparing it to pre-colonial traditional African society, gender based roles were more fluid and flexible in traditional African history, as they were and are in other traditional societies.

• Matrilineal Structures: Many cultures (e.g., Akan, Tuareg) were, and are, matrilineal, where power and property are passed down through the female line, giving women considerable social influence.
• Fluidity and Non-Binary Roles: Some pre-colonial societies recognized gender diversity or allowed women to take on social roles typically held by men, including woman-to-woman marriage or holding high political office.

In “pre-colonial times,” ..., women in West Africa were “conspicuous in high places.” They led armies, often played important consultative roles in politics, and in the case of the Lovedu people (present-day South Africa), they were even supreme Rain Queens. What it meant to be a woman in many African pre-colonial societies was not rigid. “Among the Langi of northern Uganda,” ... “the mudoko dako, or effeminate males, were treated as women and could marry men.”

It wasn't a case of where did the inequality in society go wrong, it was more a case of things being wrong all along.
Pre-colonial traditional African gender roles worked. It was the colonial export and imposition of Victorian values on traditional African societies, that created any discontent with inequality.

Impact of Colonialism
Colonialism frequently disrupted these structures by imposing Western Victorian ideals of patriarchal households, restricting women's political participation and limiting their economic roles. This led to a stricter form of patriarchy that often undervalued women's work and positions, note contributors in this

What the memory of Vitoria and the many other nonconforming victims of the inquisition demonstrates is that it is not homosexuality and trans identities that are a colonial import into Africa, but homophobia and transphobia instead.

 

[King Billy]

With religion also, there's the deep seated belief that women are the weaker sex, their brains are wired differently, which pre-ordains their gender, and that they've never been more equal, and even that sexualisation of women is their own fault.
Again as Nesrine Malik writes in her discussion of the patriarchal society:

It is one of the most deep-seated delusions in organised religion, which, vis-à-vis women’s rights, assumes that texts written by men and handed down through the ages via men, have not been compromised or coloured to the benefit of men.
Scriptures that warn us that men are lustful and not in control of their faculties when it comes to women (necessitating that women must maintain modesty so as to not inflame these feral creatures) are the very same texts we entrust these wild men to curate in their unquestionable wisdom and restraint. And yet men, and the patriarchy in general, continue to be entrusted with the narration of the laws of nature.

Malik, Nesrine. We Need New Stories: Challenging the Toxic Myths Behind Our Age of Discontent (p. 23). Orion. Kindle Edition.

 

[pete01]

 

[Highway Man]

I get the feeling that Billy actually believes all of his complete nonsense and baloney. OMG how ridiculous is that !!!!

 

[King Billy]

Are you concerned we didn't see it the first time you posted it?
Or have you run out of silly comments? Or did you forget you'd already posted it?

 

[King Billy]

I get the feeling that Billy actually believes all of his complete nonsense and baloney. OMG how ridiculous is that !!!!

We know that you frequently make comments which no-one in their right mind could possibly believe. But don't assume we all behave like trolls.
If you think that denying the existence of intersex babies and transgender people is baloney, you need to wake up.

 

[pete01]

Are you concerned we didn't see it the first time you posted it?
Or have you run out of silly comments? Or did you forget you'd already posted it?

Forgot

 

[King Billy]

Forgot

So you say, then you use the mockery emoji, which suggests you didn't forget, you were trolling.
You intentionally re-posted the youtube video because you couldn't think of any useful contribution, but you felt the need to say "I'm here".

We know you're there, and now we know how superfluous your contributions are. You would have been better respected if you'd remained silent.
Sometimes, it's better to say nothing, than to speak nonsense.