Arson attacks against Keir Starmer.

I doubt it.
Barring an unfair trial due to what the jury can’t be told, they will be convicted.
Our tinpot dictator seems to have pretty tight control over the judiciary.
You mean like Hungary or Russsia? Even Trumpf can’t control his judges
There will be some cooked up story that explains it all.
It’s called a verdict. That said while I get the basics of the conspiracy theory I’m still in the dark as to why they torched his house and cars. If it was money they could have sold their story to the Torygraph for much more than they appear to have been paid.
But you got to hand it to Pooty, generally speaking it’s been brilliantly set up.
 
Barring an unfair trial due to what the jury can’t be told, they will be convicted.

You mean like Hungary or Russsia? Even Trumpf can’t control his judges

It’s called a verdict. That said while I get the basics of the conspiracy theory I’m still in the dark as to why they torched his house and cars. If it was money they could have sold their story to the Torygraph for much more than they appear to have been paid.
They were owed money for the washing machine that they sold him
But you got to hand it to Pooty, generally speaking it’s been brilliantly set up.
Then with that statement you are just buying into different a conspiracy theory
 
They were owed money for the washing machine that they sold him
That’s plausible given the Romanian washing machine men that gave Keith Waz so much trouble. Those Ruskies are good.
Then with that statement you are just buying into different a conspiracy theory
True. Conspiracy theories and reality often have common facts. As I said that story would be worth half a million to the Torygraph
 
Blair, banned journalists from the Sun newspaper wanting to be at his press conferences back in late nineties too.
They were still backing the Tories at the time so he ostracised them.
Not a peep was said about it.
 
ON THE SUBJECT of Labour politicians trying to silence the press...

Even if there was no formal finding, unexplained irregularities should be clearly addressed public trust depends on it. She absolutely must give a clear defined reason why this occurred.
 
ON THE SUBJECT of Labour politicians trying to silence the press...

Even if there was no formal finding, unexplained irregularities should be clearly addressed public trust depends on it. She absolutely must give a clear defined reason why this occurred.
Aren't Spineless and festive able to present a case without relying on a gormless Youtube influence to present it for them?
I haven't a clue what this issue is about, and, sorry, but I have no intention of listening to that monotonous monologue from someone who looks, and sounds like he just crawled out of bed.
 
Aren't Spineless and festive able to present a case without relying on a gormless Youtube influence to present it for them?
I haven't a clue what this issue is about, and, sorry, but I have no intention of listening to that monotonous monologue from someone who looks, and sounds like he just crawled out of bed.
For once, we agree. If you want a potentially interesting story to look like nonsense then post a vid of that boring fart reading something out.

I tried, for a minute. Then gave up. No source named, I couldn't be bothered to remember his last sentence so lost track of what he was waffling on about.
 
Aren't Spineless and festive able to present a case without relying on a gormless Youtube influence to present it for them?
I haven't a clue what this issue is about, and, sorry, but I have no intention of listening to that monotonous monologue from someone who looks, and sounds like he just crawled out of bed.

Video for Himmy...

 
Back
Top