Yeah, religion is quite comparable to UFOs given that was painted 1,700 years laterThey painted instead
Baptism of Christ: 633
A record for a Fitzwilliam Museum object: Painting 633data.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk
UFOs
- Thread starter aveatry
- Start date
Anyone for
www.greatamericanhikes.com
Fancy a petroglyph then
The Haunting Rock Art of Sego Canyon
It's one of the most mysterious ancient rock art sites in the American Southwest. Haunting images depicting limbless human-like figures with hollowed out eyes and strange looking antennae blanket the sandstone walls of southern Utah's Thompson Canyon. Formally known as Sego Canyon Interpretive...
www.greatamericanhikes.com
Of course they do. Some people will believe anything.
At last, evidence of Chemtrails!Anyone for
Fancy a petroglyph then
The Haunting Rock Art of Sego Canyon
It's one of the most mysterious ancient rock art sites in the American Southwest. Haunting images depicting limbless human-like figures with hollowed out eyes and strange looking antennae blanket the sandstone walls of southern Utah's Thompson Canyon. Formally known as Sego Canyon Interpretive...
Do try to keep to the subject -
You're the one relying on 10,000 year old cave paintings as a rebuttal to the lack of mobile phone footage
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 14,513
- Reaction score
- 4,626
- Country
They would be lost, they are searching for intelligent life forms.
It's interesting that, with all of the miracles in the real world, you choose to nail your identity to the wares of crackpots and grifters.
Have a listen to it he is comparing what has been said in the past to the new transcript from secret files and photos released
He is a clinical and forensic psychologist, and also does trump and Epstein - I bet you will listen to them and NOT call him a crackpot.
A nice summary of where we're at
Try and stick to the thread
A nice summary of where we're at
I've started watching it. He's wrong at 1:40, the moon was very bright which is why the astronauts couldn't see the stars. Basic physics/biology.
The rest is just him obsessing over trivia with no attempt to see if there ever was any official explanations.
If he had he'd have found the NASA investigation into the flashes of light that were observed and that at least one paper was published on it in 1971 and presented at an international conference.
The photo artifacts are marveled over, and then ignored. He has no idea what they are, just that they're clearly important because they were classified!?!. One question would be could these be lens flare or film defects? After all they also appear over the ground if you look closer and the blue one in particular and the repeating nature is classic lens flare. You also see it in loads of the other, unclassified, Apollo photos.
The rest is body language analysis, a field that's closer to astrology than astronomy and hasn't got any point to it. Apparently astronauts can't get bored and fidgety in press conferences and this shows....?
Badly researched, ignorant and credulous in the extreme. A TV personality latching onto the conspiracy theorist market to boost his YouTube views.
Last edited:
Right up their (low intelligence - high gullibility) alley.
He is another You Tube Faux conspiracist, making money out of the Gullible.
