UFOs

UFOs obviously happen, they nearly all then become IFOs when people lookinto them. Some don't but that doesn't mean they're staffed by little green men.
And they are identified almost immediately these days with everyone filming. It's no accident that the rate at which these objects are identified has picked up somewhat since everyone can film these days.
 
And they are identified almost immediately these days with everyone filming. It's no accident that the rate at which these objects are identified has picked up somewhat since everyone can film these days.
Are you an alien?
 
I've started watching it. He's wrong at 1:40, the moon was very bright which is why the astronauts couldn't see the stars. Basic physics/biology.

The rest is just him obsessing over trivia with no attempt to see if there ever was any official explanations.
If he had he'd have found the NASA investigation into the flashes of light that were observed and that at least one paper was published on it in 1971 and presented at an international conference.


The photo artifacts are marveled over, and then ignored. He has no idea what they are, just that they're clearly important because they were classified!?!. One question would be could these be lens flare or film defects? After all they also appear over the ground if you look closer and the blue one in particular and the repeating nature is classic lens flare. You also see it in loads of the other, unclassified, Apollo photos.

The rest is body language analysis, a field that's closer to astrology than astronomy and hasn't got any point to it. Apparently astronauts can't get bored and fidgety in press conferences and this shows....?

Badly researched, ignorant and credulous in the extreme. A TV personality latching onto the conspiracy theorist market to boost his YouTube views.
Glad that you finally plucked up the courage to watch it. But the blue "flare" is not a flare as to flare you need a strong point of light to the side of the lens also that is a Carl zeiss lens on a Hasselblad and its very difficult to get that lens to flare also the sun light is directly behind them- there is nothing to cause a flare. And it is not a classic lens flare at all. Neither does it feature on other publicly released photos.
The photos are interesting because there has been accounts over the years of people mistakenly finding themselves in room full of NASA employees "painting out" anomalies on negative copies.
There are many more to come this was just the warm up.
 
Having flown a bit I have seen a few things I couldn't identify but not as "ideal" maybe, as some of the stuff above. In the category of "what the f was that?" Many pilots would say they've seen a few odd things.
There are some wierd natural causes, like ball lightning. A schoolteacher I know really well, boring and grounded as you can imagine, said she saw it moving along a corridoor in the school once. She said, "Yes I had to look ut up"!. I'd be shouting it from the rooftops
Look up Hessdalen lights too, a valley in Norway where there are elements (chemical, not lightbulb)in the ground and an acidic stream. Way too many glowing orbs have been seen there than anything predictable from a couple of volts. As far as our science tells us, so far. There was a telly prog years ago.

Yes there's stuff occuring that we can't explain, and it's not impossible that there's some sort of galactic web crawler thing that nosies about to see things.

What's just plain stupid is to call it all a conspiracy, though one of silence is understandable. Fantasizing about something like chem... is utter silliness.
 
Glad that you finally plucked up the courage to watch it. But the blue "flare" is not a flare as to flare you need a strong point of light to the side of the lens also that is a Carl zeiss lens on a Hasselblad and its very difficult to get that lens to flare also the sun light is directly behind them- there is nothing to cause a flare. And it is not a classic lens flare at all. Neither does it feature on other publicly released photos.
The photos are interesting because there has been accounts over the years of people mistakenly finding themselves in room full of NASA employees "painting out" anomalies on negative copies.
There are many more to come this was just the warm up.
Strong source of light? They're standing in direct sunlight on the moon. Being scientifically illiterate you probably don't realise that's always as bright as the brightest day at the equator. Do you know how many cameras they burnt out up there?

And again, if these lights were strange signs of alien ships above the horizon, why are there these blue lights also sitting on the lunar surface a few meters away from them?
 
Bright lights and hot orbs: Experts urge caution around the release of the new files, warning that UAP videos are often misinterpreted and mischaracterized by those unfamiliar with military technology. A 2024 Pentagon report rebutted claims that the U.S. government has recovered alien technology or confirmed evidence of alien life.
 
Until one of the boffins can explain this...

wow_signal_1063x600.jpg

...i'll keep my options open.
 
Back
Top