That's not how science works.They can prove this, how?
That's not how science works.They can prove this, how?
Really?That's not how science works.
Not quite no. The scientific method is about how you investigate things and structure theories.Really?
I thought the Scientific Method was all about providing proof.
But their theory is predicated on an unprovable premise.Not quite no. The scientific method is about how you investigate things and structure theories.

Someone had a go at me trying to get me to accept christianity. So I used ChatGPT to check a few facts about what the person was claiming.....Like people really believing in UFO theories?
You can't prove anything about that signal now, it's 50 years old. But their theory could be supported by other similar emissions being detected of similar scale from other hydrogen clouds.But their theory is predicated on an unprovable premise.
How's that work?
You can't prove anything about that signal now, it's 50 years old. But their theory could be supported by other similar emissions being detected of similar scale from other hydrogen clouds.
There are still things in physics we can't describe or explain. The UFO nuts can't accept that uncertainty and need to blame it on Aliens or Gods.
Are you Rick-rollin' me?
Direct sunlight is behind them look at the shadows - to create a lens flare a source of strong light needs to hit the lens at a side angle, so from behind will not do it. Its a carlr zeiss t* lens the best in the world at the time specially manufactured to not produce lens flare - like I said its very difficult to get theses lenses to flare. Also the shape and angle do not represent a flare. You are talking complete rubbish on a subject you know nothing about.Strong source of light? They're standing in direct sunlight on the moon. Being scientifically illiterate you probably don't realise that's always as bright as the brightest day at the equator.
Wrong again there are 12 cameras left on the moon - they removed the film magazines and left the body and lens behind to save weight on return so they could bring back more moon rocks. Also No cameras were "burned out on the moon, you are talking complete rubbish.Do you know how many cameras they burnt out up there?
Wrong there are no such blue lights sitting on the surface near to them - show me that image. There are NONE in the image posted here that contains the blue lightsAnd again, if these lights were strange signs of alien ships above the horizon, why are there these blue lights also sitting on the lunar surface a few meters away from them?
He just blurts out stuff as if he is an expert - its not the first time I have caught him out doing it. He is one of those blokes down the pub that thinks he knows it all but everyone just think he is just a tw--atIT is talking out of his rear as usual...

Anything you talk about he will become an instant expert in that subject. The internet breeds them I am sure.He just blurts out stuff as if he is an expert - its not the first time I have caught him out doing it. He is one of those blokes down the pub that thinks he knows it all but everyone just think he is just a tw--at
considering he thinks himself an IT expert he didn’t even know that you could track aircraft with an app or via a website - for at least the last 10 yearsAnything you talk about he will become an instant expert in that subject. The internet breeds them I am sure.