- Joined
- 22 Aug 2006
- Messages
- 7,551
- Reaction score
- 1,353
- Country

Oh sure I'm not disputing that - that's just the start!Ok, but I said “on” earth

Oh sure I'm not disputing that - that's just the start!Ok, but I said “on” earth
There is also the theory that our whole universe is within a black hole.The things not on earth are confounding the scientists.
Using the James Webb scope, we can look back to relatively close to the time of the Big Bang.
Scientists are pretty sure how long ago that was - there are about 4 ways to measure it, and they agree.
Buggeration is, that what we see is far more galaxies than we can explain out there/back then, and each would have taken far longer than the time they had, to form, according to our understanding.
They shouldn't be there.
So either we're wrong about the age of the universe , which throws our entire understanding of physics into the bin or
there was something around before the big bang. That appeals to me far more, but I don't fully understand about those 4 agreeing methods which make that impossible. Scientist are clinging to the big bang - our "cosmological model" because they DO trust the age of it.
Or there was a different set of laws of physics which allowed those galaxies to form really fast. Or something.
Maybe there were great concentrations of dark matter which produced incredibly strong gravitational fields which - obviously - affect time. I'm prattling above my pay grade now.
A researcher in the UK (Leicester?) called Lopez discovered it first, along with structures in what we can see of the universe, which again, shouldn't be there. ("Giant arc" etc).
Nobody has said yet, afaik, "but she was only a woman"!
TFFT!
So now that you have seen the vid again that I posted for you of the relevant section are you still going with lens flare.Hmm, well, the "void" is not just earth,
It includes our solar system
our galaxy
and about 100000 similar galaxies
and a load of smaller ones
All in our local supercluster of galaxies.
It's called Laika something, a bit like that dog.
so it's a little disingenuous to say that Earth stands out!

No, I had to teach GCSE Astronomy.I see you have been googling - ok its a void as in relation the rest of the universe

I just told you, read it, that I didn't find it.So now that you have seen the vid again that I posted for you of the relevant section are you still going with lens flare.
So instead of silly meams - have a look at the vid section I posted and tell us what you think it is.
No, I had to teach GCSE Astronomy.
No it is NOT true to say that Earth is in a void in relation to anything, which is what you said. ""Oasis in the Desert"
Now you're BS ing. Going off at a tangent in a vain attempt to - I dunno what really. I think most just laugh at you and your drivlings
I posted it again for you --- here have a look zoom in with your phone or padI just told you, read it, that I didn't find it.
Yes lots of stuff came off like heat shield tiles, Ice - it was all close by "flitting past" spinning - rotating but the object does not - it appears totally stationary from behind the starship as it rotates - the object does not move but the starship is rotating and "re-veils" it behind itIt isn't worth it tbh. Something came off the rocket,
No I described it as appearing - why are you making up what I saidif it's as you describe it "hiding".
Why so negative and abusive - there is no need.Suggesting that it's something mystical is puerile & pathetic tbh.

man made climate change is made up nonsenseThere is also the theory that our whole universe is within a black hole.

Because I think you're deluding yourself, being ridiculous, entertaining daft ideas about what you can't understand, etc.Why so negative and abusive

Wasn't there some made up waffle about passenger planes putting stuff into the exhausts for some unknown unspecified reason?man made climate change is made up nonsense
we all live inside a giant black hole
some mad theory about vaccines
any thing else you can add to this interesting list ?
More likely, I've dug into it a darned site more than you have. What you wrote was piffle, nowhere near right.chose the sky at night version as your GCSE training probably only amounts to the sky at night.
Don't take my word for itWasn't there some made up waffle about passenger planes putting stuff into the exhausts for some unknown unspecified reason?
More likely, I've dug into it a darned site more than you have. What you wrote was piffle, nowhere near right.
Did you know this "hole" is just a region a bit less dense, it's not a hole at all.
"Oasis In the desert" was an utterly ****tish thing to write.
Like most of your stuff.
examples to back that up would be helpful.
You take something well known, lie about it for some weird motive known only to you
Then you go nit-picking words and off at tangents. That is just TROLLING.
You lied when you said I said it was hiding - I never did - it became visible as the starship turned - it was there all along but obscured by starship - what dont you understand about that'Appearing from behind = unhiding. Why make a fuss about something "made up" when there's nothing,
So it didn’t come off starship - that what other it would be moving and or spinningNo I haven't seen anything which categorically can't be a lens effect.
You say it cannot be something which came off because it's not spinning. So this one isn't spinning. So what.
What has that got to do with youBecause I think you're deluding yourself, being ridiculous, entertaining daft ideas about what you can't understand, etc.
You don't even try.
You seem to like to talk **** and live in a fantasy.
So you agree with me then .So what if it's not clear what the thing is?
read back I have said so about 3 timesso what are you suggesting it is?
If you like.man made climate change is made up nonsense
Its an actual theorywe all live inside a giant black hole
What mad theory have I said - clue _ I haven’tsome mad theory about vaccines
So what do you make of the vid then.any thing else you can add to this interesting list ?