Veiled contributors.
- Thread starter noseall
- Start date
- Status
Sponsored Links
B
Brigade77
The easiset way to expose a sock puppet is to engage it's persona in a disagreement.
Who backs it up ?
You need to do this just enougth times & it becomes clear exactly who controls which sock.
I've been doing it for years & amazingly . . . but possibly not here . . . most of a forums traffic is usually from the forum owner.
Another good way is to simply 'hack' the logs of the forum software & follow the IP's. I've never done this personally but the 'how to's' are readily available if you know where to look
Who backs it up ?
You need to do this just enougth times & it becomes clear exactly who controls which sock.
I've been doing it for years & amazingly . . . but possibly not here . . . most of a forums traffic is usually from the forum owner.
Another good way is to simply 'hack' the logs of the forum software & follow the IP's. I've never done this personally but the 'how to's' are readily available if you know where to look
Well I think I already posted a pic of me (When I were a nipper) so here's a vid... of me ...Now !!
D
Deleted member 63160
Another good way is to simply 'hack' the logs of the forum software & follow the IP's. I've never done this personally but the 'how to's' are readily available if you know where to look
Seeing as I am worth about 1/tinyteenth of what you are, also puter illiterate, thus requiring charitable help, could you you post some links for "us" to find out how to hack these things??
Sponsored Links
D
Deleted member 63160
I saw yah! Right hand side of the dash about 0.13. You're no tatty ted but much more hench than noseall!
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
As I said earlier, it is behaviour such as this:
that encourages many to hide their personal details.
When such long-term members exploit the slightest personal detail in their troll-like behaviour, and sink to such depths of obscene depravity, it makes sense to not disclose any personal details whatsoever.
Such behaviour, especially from long-term members sets the culture and tone of these boards.
In setting the tone and culture of these forums, such long-term members probably discourage many more professionals and experts from participation in these forums. That can only be damaging to the site. It is impossible to perceive how such breaches of professional etiquette might be beneficial.
that encourages many to hide their personal details.
When such long-term members exploit the slightest personal detail in their troll-like behaviour, and sink to such depths of obscene depravity, it makes sense to not disclose any personal details whatsoever.
Such behaviour, especially from long-term members sets the culture and tone of these boards.
In setting the tone and culture of these forums, such long-term members probably discourage many more professionals and experts from participation in these forums. That can only be damaging to the site. It is impossible to perceive how such breaches of professional etiquette might be beneficial.
B
blightymam
When a thread is locked, it's not good to drag your argument onto another - unless you want to get another thread locked Himmy? It does seem to be your modus operandi.
Smile/snap. So sad Himmy.
Last edited by a moderator:
Really? How do you cope in the real world?
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
Just because there are bad things happening elsewhere, that is no justification for replicating that bad behaviour in other spheres. In fact, quite the reverse, we should seek to NOT replicate bad behaviour, especially when it entails poor professional etiquette, on what is supposedly a site to seek expert opinion. It should be the long-term members who should set the tone and culture of sites such as this.
A very long-winded reply, while holding onto a completely different stick.....
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
You do not see the connection and the extension of the same discussion?
B
blightymam
So you've been here, what, around 10 years Himmy? And you tell people that they have bad behaviour?
Have all these people you're telling off been banned as many times as you?
Do you have such low self-awareness that you cannot see your posts that complain about other's behaviour continually highlight your own?
Some examples. Please look at the amount of name-calling, lowering the tone and basic trolling behaviour that you show on a daily basis. Then have a good, hard look in the mirror and practice what you preach. We can all see that you're a silly silly hypocrite, shame you are so conceited that you do not see it in yourself. This forum really is better without you in it.
In your own words:
Last edited by a moderator:
A shorter version of "I haven't a clue". Let's hope you're cottoning on to the attraction of brevity.
Or, "I don't want to discuss this, so I'll divert to what i want to yak about, instead".
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
I fully accept that my behaviour has been bad and thoroughly unprofessional. But I make no apology for it concerning my comments towards woody.
My initial reaction to his unwarranted and unsupported accusation of plagiarism was one of indignation. I deleted my comments and cancelled my registration, thereby withdrawing from any further discussion and severing any possible connection with my professional reputation.
My singular objective in returning to the site was to attempt to goad woody into retracting his accusation or providing some evidence that would support his accusation. He chose not to do the former and I knew he could not succeed on the latter.
I even offered him a further honorable course of action, he still refused to consider that possibility. He preferred to respond with insults, reaching to depths of obscene depravity.
I consider that a complete breach of professional conduct and a level of behaviour utterly unbecoming of any self-pronounced professional. His attitude and behaviour must discourage any other professionals or experts, or even willing volunteers, to become involved on the site.
I would suggest that woody needs to have a good long hard look at himself and his acceptable standard of professional conduct.
If you seek to support his unprofessional conduct, then I would suggest that you also need to reconsider.
Because of his unprofessional attitude I will not be contributing any further advice on these boards. I will however continue with my singular objective to remind woody of his unprofessional attitude and his responsibility to set acceptable standards in these forums.
In the meantime I consider my right to participate in other discussions. If you seek to deny me that right, which you appear to be suggesting, because you disagree with my opinions, you also have that right. Whether it comes to fruition, we await the outcome.
Last edited:
You only came back to goad Woody. Your "singular objective". Your words.
And repeated.
You then state in the same post that you will continue to participate in other discussions.
What a tizz you're in!
And repeated.
You then state in the same post that you will continue to participate in other discussions.
What a tizz you're in!
- Status
Sponsored Links
