Angela Rayner

yes


off you trot and prove it wrong if you like
An assessment to recover tax that has been under-assessed or under-declared, or over-repaid or wrongly credited, can be made within 20 years of the end of the relevant tax period, see CH51700, in several situations. These are as follows.

Deliberate behaviour
Failure to notify
Avoidance Schemes
Arrangements intended to bring about a loss of VAT

In the Compliance Handbook ‘failure to notify’ means that a person has not complied with one of the relevant obligations listed in CH71300 on or before the appropriate date.

An assessment can be made as described at the top of this page if there has been a loss of tax and one of the following situations applies.

The person has failed to notify chargeability to income tax or capital gains tax, but see exception below.

Exceptions (which do not apply to her case)

For income tax and capital gains tax, where a person has failed to notify chargeability under TMA70/S7, the 20 year rule might not apply to 2008/09 or earlier. It only applies to those years if the loss of tax was due to the person’s negligent conduct or the negligent conduct of someone acting on their behalf.


So again - they are not out of time.

Dianne Abbot was one of several black MPs elected and you have to go back a few 100 years to find the first black and ethnic minority MPs.
 
Sponsored Links
Its not the Tax thats the problem though. Its easy to make a mistake / misinterpret the obligation. If pointed out she should have apologised and put it right. Then end of story.

But no that is not what has happened and its the repeated refusals, the cover up and denials that are the real problem and far worse than any missed tax liability.


I posted this some time ago. Its seems a certain demographic on this forum refuses to see what is right in front of them. Its not about the money but the deceit that matters.
 
An assessment to recover tax that has been under-assessed or under-declared, or over-repaid or wrongly credited, can be made within 20 years of the end of the relevant tax period, see CH51700, in several situations. These are as follows.

Deliberate behaviour
Failure to notify
Avoidance Schemes
Arrangements intended to bring about a loss of VAT

In the Compliance Handbook ‘failure to notify’ means that a person has not complied with one of the relevant obligations listed in CH71300 on or before the appropriate date.

An assessment can be made as described at the top of this page if there has been a loss of tax and one of the following situations applies.

The person has failed to notify chargeability to income tax or capital gains tax, but see exception below.

Exceptions (which do not apply to her case)

For income tax and capital gains tax, where a person has failed to notify chargeability under TMA70/S7, the 20 year rule might not apply to 2008/09 or earlier. It only applies to those years if the loss of tax was due to the person’s negligent conduct or the negligent conduct of someone acting on their behalf.


So again - they are not out of time.

Dianne Abbot was one of several black MPs elected and you have to go back a few 100 years to find the first black and ethnic minority MPs.
So you’ve no evidence it’s not out of time

Just conjecture





Dianne Abbot was one of several black MPs elected and you have to go back a few 100 years to find the first black and ethnic minority MPs.
Do come back when you’ve got some evidence.
 
Sponsored Links
people in public office should obey the rules

especially the ones in positions of great responsibility and with access to the finest professional advice

I think we can all agree on that.

 
Oh look there its a squirrel
this entire thread is an attempt to distract from Tory sleaze and their wipeout at the rapidly approaching election.

Remember the Tories chose ace sleazeball Johnson. Who's been sacked by every employer, wife and mistress he's ever had. And by his party.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top