- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 25,250
- Reaction score
- 5,562
- Country

He is an ajuducated rapist
You may not like it, but it is what he is

He is an ajuducated rapist
You may not like it, but it is what he is

Not my term. It's the official line.a what now?
![]()

The official lineNot my term. It's the official line.
Sorry if you've not found it out

Take it up with judge Kaplan if you don't like itThe official line
A criminal court, with the jurisdiction to determine a rape trial has found him guilty of rape?
Standard diplomatic fare, when it comes to the fragile orange rapist.

No need, I know the answer.Take it up with judge Kaplan if you don't like it

Take it up with the judgeNo need, I know the answer.
He was never arrested, charged, tried or convicted of rape.

I'm not defending him. It's a fact that he wasn't convicted of rape, no need to be embarrassed. Nobody expected you to know anything.Take it up with the judge
Keep defending the adjudicated rapist.
Embarrassing. Again
Did Trump incite violence in his speech on Jan 6th Yes or No?did they or did they not:
Splice together two entirely separate parts of President Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021? Yes or No
Did they depict President Trump telling supporters: “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”? yes or no
Is it true that he never uttered this sequence of words? yes or no
did they omit President Trump stating, less than one minute after urging supporters to cheer for their senators and congressmen, “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard” yes or no
I've highlighted the correct answer for you.
That seems to be the gist of what the claimant suggests the beeb did wrong.

0/2. but good try.Did Trump incite violence in his speech on Jan 6th Yes or No?
Does it damage Trumps reputation? Yes or No?
gosh isnt Trump doing well, Filly reminded us how you were saying how Trump was making things better for the peopleWhich has never been in question. The BBC admit it and apologised. The defamation case centres around whether or not malice' was involved.

I'm not defending him.
On a technicality court wise as I'm sure you knowIt's a fact that he wasn't convicted of rape, no need to be embarrassed.
But the official line was that he is an ajuducated rapistNobody expected you to know anything.
Motorbiking, are you claiming that Donald Trump did not incite violence on Jan 6th?0/2. but good try.

Stating a fact about someone is not defending him.But you are
No, it's miles apart from that.. it's not a technicality at all - he's never been on trial for rape. He didn't get off on a technicality.On a technicality court wise as I'm sure you know
again no. Only a criminal court would have this power and there has never been a criminal trial.But the official line was that he is an ajuducated rapist
True, or false? Let's see if you are not defending him now
Correct.Take it up with judge Kaplan if you don't like it