Oh Jimmy Jimmy

King Billy said:
Total nonsense as usual from the usual nonsense generator.



Does HWM never get tired of being wrong? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
I am talking specifically in the UK, we will dissmiss any assylum seekers claim if they have claimed assylum in another coutry. Also why would anyone want to claim assylum in multiple countrrys.
 
Highway Man said:
I am talking specifically in the UK, we will dissmiss any assylum seekers claim if they have claimed assylum in another coutry. Also why would anyone want to claim assylum in multiple countrrys.
Click to expand...
UK must find one of those other countries to accept the application.
So it's just another procedural step. If UK cannot find another country to accept their application, UK is duty bound to accept it, and process it just like any other application.
So your response is moot, i.e. it has no relevance or certainty.
All of this is easily available via google. So why do you keep posting nonsensical rubbish?

Highway Man said:
Also why would anyone want to claim assylum in multiple countrrys.
Click to expand...
You'd best ask them. For me your question is an irrelevant squirrel.
 
Highway Man said:
www.gov.uk

Nationality and Borders Bill: inadmissibility for those travelling through or with a connection to safe third countries

www.gov.uk www.gov.uk
Click to expand...
Noticed the relevant words:
Therefore, to deter people from making these journeys to the UK we will seek the rapid removal of these individuals to the safe country from which they travelled to the UK or to another safe country.
Click to expand...
Its toothless. It's like May's vans driving round "Go Home before we catch you" plastered all over them.

You really should read your source material before relying on what you think you know.
 
The Illegal Migration Act 2023, which became law on July 20, 2023, aims to deter illegal entry to the UK, particularly via small boat crossings. It mandates the detention and removal of anyone arriving illegally—having passed through a safe country—to their home country or a third country. This act renders asylum and human rights claims inadmissible for such individuals and limits legal challenges.
 
motorbiking said:
That’s the bill. It became law which makes himmy’s comment irrelevant.

Not that this will surprise you.
Click to expand...
motorbiking said:
The Illegal Migration Act 2023, which became law on July 20, 2023, aims to deter illegal entry to the UK, particularly via small boat crossings. It mandates the detention and removal of anyone arriving illegally—having passed through a safe country—to their home country or a third country. This act renders asylum and human rights claims inadmissible for such individuals and limits legal challenges.
Click to expand...
UK domestic law can ignore UN Charter and UNHCR, but it leaves itself open to challenges at the UNHCR and ECHR
UK has a statutory duty to comply with UNHCR, and ECHR

But the impracticalities of implementing the requirements of the UK Law remain.
If UK wants to remove an asylum seeker to another country it first has to find another country willing to accept the asylum seeker, and to accept their application. It can't just dump the asylum seeker on another country's shores.
The fundamentals of the Refugee Charter remain in force, e.g. non-refoulement, etc.

If UK refuses to process an asylum claim, and can't find another country to accept the refugees application, the refugee enters a state of limbo, in the UK, with no access to asylum.
It is the kind of situation engineered by the Tories when they simply stopped processing applications, and the number of unprocessed asylum seekers grew to numbers that made it difficult to accommodate them all.
 
Elsa TLC said:
Depends on your ideas of wrongs and rights
Click to expand...

You said

Elsa TLC said:
I genuinely believe you both mean harm to this country. In saying that I think your genuinely dangerous.
Click to expand...

Which is a bit more than thinking they are wrong.

I think you're wrong about a great many things, but I don't think you mean harm to the country or are genuinely dangerous.

So, please intelligently, and rationally (both vital), and with due consideration of our actual laws, and widely held standards, please present the case for them meaning harm to this country and being dangerous.
 
Dec27 said:
Elsa TLC said:
I genuinely believe you both mean harm to this country. In saying that I think your genuinely dangerous.

From today I will block you and King Billy until hes born again. Then Ill block him again.
Click to expand...

odds is basically a terrorist; stirring up hate and getting away with it.

Block the sausages mate.
Click to expand...

Elsa TLC and Dec27 be like

jim-carrey-jim-carrey-dumb-and-dumber.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Jimmy page and his new girlfriend
2
Replies
15
Views
2K
Whitespirit66
Whitespirit66
Bahco
Funniest Comedian
2
Replies
15
Views
2K
John506
J
G
Im a celeb..... ITV
2
Replies
15
Views
2K
youngroughcaster
Y
JohnD
Shut up about MPs
2 3
Replies
38
Views
2K
Notch7
N
festive
Post-colonial guilt stops UK helping Christians who are being persecuted around the world, bishop sa
Replies
3
Views
690
ellal
E
Back
Top