Oh Jimmy Jimmy

[King Billy]

and this all depends if they have tried to claim assylum anywhere else.

Total nonsense as usual from the usual nonsense generator.

Asylum seekers can legally apply for asylum in multiple countries, as the 1951 Refugee Convention does not require them to claim protection in the first safe country they reach. While individuals can physically file claims in several nations, they generally cannot be granted refugee status in more than one.

Does HWM never get tired of being wrong?

 

[King Billy]

Not sure where that came from but it ignores the fact that the convention does not dictate to a state who they should and should not deem qualifies.

The UN charter dictates that posted by Securespark.
Your comment is a typical Strawman. He, and it, does not discuss whether the country should or shouldn't grant asylum to any applicants.
The country can decide the qualifying criteria and if it's ben met.

Perfectly legal to make an application inadmissible due to method of entry.

Under domestic law, yes, but the UN Charter does not, and is not changed by domestic law. Any signatory to the UN charter is bound by that UN Charter. UK is a signatory, and is therefore bound by that charter, irrespective of any domestic law.
The UN Charter overrides and negates any contradictory doemstic law.

 

[King Billy]

odds is basically a terrorist; stirring up hate and getting away with it.

Block the sausages mate.

Dec27 is a troll making false and unprovable accusations, which demonstrates his lack of sincerity and integrity.

 

[morqthana]

How would you know?

Because there's nothing in what either of them write to indicate that they mean harm to this country and are genuinely dangerous.

 

[Elsa TLC]

So what do you think woke actually means then?

We all know what it means.
Like the word majic it doesn't warrant an explanation.

James O'brien is getting in your head.

 

[King Billy]

We all know what it means.
Like the word majic it doesn't warrant an explanation.

James O'brien is getting in your head.

What does majic mean?
It does warrant an explanation.

 

[Elsa TLC]

Because there's nothing in what either of them write to indicate that they mean harm to this country and are genuinely dangerous.

Depends on your ideas of wrongs and rights

 

[Highway Man]

Total nonsense as usual from the usual nonsense generator.



Does HWM never get tired of being wrong?

I am talking specifically in the UK, we will dissmiss any assylum seekers claim if they have claimed assylum in another coutry. Also why would anyone want to claim assylum in multiple countrrys.

 

[Highway Man]

Nationality and Borders Bill: inadmissibility for those travelling through or with a connection to safe third countries

www.gov.uk

 

[King Billy]

I am talking specifically in the UK, we will dissmiss any assylum seekers claim if they have claimed assylum in another coutry. Also why would anyone want to claim assylum in multiple countrrys.

UK must find one of those other countries to accept the application.
So it's just another procedural step. If UK cannot find another country to accept their application, UK is duty bound to accept it, and process it just like any other application.
So your response is moot, i.e. it has no relevance or certainty.
All of this is easily available via google. So why do you keep posting nonsensical rubbish?

Also why would anyone want to claim assylum in multiple countrrys.

You'd best ask them. For me your question is an irrelevant squirrel.

 

[King Billy]

Nationality and Borders Bill: inadmissibility for those travelling through or with a connection to safe third countries

www.gov.uk

Noticed the relevant words:

Therefore, to deter people from making these journeys to the UK we will seek the rapid removal of these individuals to the safe country from which they travelled to the UK or to another safe country.

Its toothless. It's like May's vans driving round "Go Home before we catch you" plastered all over them.

You really should read your source material before relying on what you think you know.

 

[motorbiking]

Nationality and Borders Bill: inadmissibility for those travelling through or with a connection to safe third countries

www.gov.uk

That’s the bill. It became law which makes himmy’s comment irrelevant.

Not that this will surprise you.

 

[motorbiking]

The Illegal Migration Act 2023, which became law on July 20, 2023, aims to deter illegal entry to the UK, particularly via small boat crossings. It mandates the detention and removal of anyone arriving illegally—having passed through a safe country—to their home country or a third country. This act renders asylum and human rights claims inadmissible for such individuals and limits legal challenges.

 

[King Billy]

That’s the bill. It became law which makes himmy’s comment irrelevant.

Not that this will surprise you.

The Illegal Migration Act 2023, which became law on July 20, 2023, aims to deter illegal entry to the UK, particularly via small boat crossings. It mandates the detention and removal of anyone arriving illegally—having passed through a safe country—to their home country or a third country. This act renders asylum and human rights claims inadmissible for such individuals and limits legal challenges.

UK domestic law can ignore UN Charter and UNHCR, but it leaves itself open to challenges at the UNHCR and ECHR
UK has a statutory duty to comply with UNHCR, and ECHR

But the impracticalities of implementing the requirements of the UK Law remain.
If UK wants to remove an asylum seeker to another country it first has to find another country willing to accept the asylum seeker, and to accept their application. It can't just dump the asylum seeker on another country's shores.
The fundamentals of the Refugee Charter remain in force, e.g. non-refoulement, etc.

If UK refuses to process an asylum claim, and can't find another country to accept the refugees application, the refugee enters a state of limbo, in the UK, with no access to asylum.
It is the kind of situation engineered by the Tories when they simply stopped processing applications, and the number of unprocessed asylum seekers grew to numbers that made it difficult to accommodate them all.

 

[morqthana]

Does HWM never get tired of being wrong?

As he actively seeks it out, I'd say he feels energised by being wrong.