UFOs

I've said what I think it is and you disagree, you haven't said what you think it is. You've listened possibilities.
I think you must be on some sort of neurodivergent scale. I keep saying that I think It is a solid physical object. Hovering /floating / orbiting/dangling on a piece of string.
 
I think you must be on some sort of neurodivergent scale. I keep saying that I think It is a solid physical object. Hovering /floating / orbiting/dangling on a piece of string.
A solid object, but one that was invisible from the ground and presumably from radar.

Did you ever work out how large it was or why it was floating over Florida?

You think that is more likely than a lens flare?
 
Actually that could be the jellyfish after all, I'd miscalculated the location to be further away than the launch site. It would also explain why no one saw it from earth.
 
Last edited:
Funny isn’t it all noseits posts were just mocking - nothing to add to the conversation - not thoughts of his own to what it could be and then as soon as I said "no one else thinks its a lens flare" to minions post - up he pops saying he thinks it is lens flare. :rolleyes:
As opposed to those that have neither the wit, or the nous to look beyond the numb-of-mind, goto term 'UFO'.

I'll stick with Minion, at least he writes with joined up thinking. :cool:
 
A solid object, but one that was invisible from the ground and presumably from radar.
Yes or maybe not because if you want to attach a conspiracy to it then yes clearly seen on radar - ignored because they know all about it and or its one of ours.
Did you ever work out how large it was or why it was floating over Florida?
No but it looks like it is casting its own shadow upon itself which makes it look enormous. Or it could be a case of this.
fghjke.JPG

You think that is more likely than a lens flare?
Yes - lens flares do not slowly peep into view from behind something. - Its not a lens flare its a solid object.
 
I see that Justin has not come back with a reply to me question - flare or plume.
Oh I've been busy - or I've realised it was an observer drone from the planet Zog , which got bored and moved away. Take your pick.

It's certainly unidentified as we don't know what it is. I'm not sure it's "flying" but if it is, it's a UFO. Common as muck!

I didn't see it peeking out from behind anything, and I can't find the vid now.
If it didn't actually do that then internal lens reflections can get focused in odd places - so that's very possible. They can be an image of something, which gives an apparent structure.
Prime candidates for objects would be ice/frozen oxygen, or an insulation blanket, or possibly a piece of rocket which fell off when the booster went.

Trying to claim it's something alien though, I would say is plain daft.
 
Oh I've been busy - or I've realised it was an observer drone from the planet Zog , which got bored and moved away. Take your pick.

It's certainly unidentified as we don't know what it is. I'm not sure it's "flying" but if it is, it's a UFO. Common as muck!

I didn't see it peeking out from behind anything, and I can't find the vid now.
Here it it is. Really useful actually as I have just worked out how to post a link direct to a section of vid without telling people to fast forward
Tap play and watch it on a phone or pad, do not tap the full screen arrows and that way you can use two fingers to zoom in for a better view
If it didn't actually do that then internal lens reflections can get focused in odd places - so that's very possible. They can be an image of something, which gives an apparent structure.
Prime candidates for objects would be ice/frozen oxygen, or an insulation blanket, or possibly a piece of rocket which fell off when the booster went.
It wasn’t moving / spinning.
Trying to claim it's something alien though, I would say is plain daft.
I have never tried to claim that it is alien though.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top